Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 13, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
A comparison of methods to calculate a total merit index using stochastic simulation
Christina Pfeiffer1, Birgit Fuerst-Waltl2, Hermann Schwarzenbacher3
1Department of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, Division of Livestock Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Gregor-Mendel-Straße 33, 1180, Vienna, Austria. christina.pfeiffer@boku.ac.at.
Approximate multitrait models using yield deviations or de-regressed breeding values provide accurate estimated breeding values (EBV) for dairy cattle. Ignoring residual covariances in selection index approaches can lead to significant bias in EBV.
Area of Science:
- Animal breeding and genetics
- Quantitative genetics
- Dairy cattle evaluation
Background:
- Dairy cattle breeding aims to improve production and functional traits using estimated breeding values (EBV).
- Multivariate animal models are complex; approximate methods are often used for total merit index derivation.
- Current methods often rely on single-trait models or approximate multivariate approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare a full multitrait animal model with approximate multitrait models and a selection index approach.
- To evaluate the accuracy and bias of different methods for deriving total merit index in dairy cattle.
- To assess the impact of residual covariances on the performance of these methods.
Main Methods:
- Simulated data for three production and two functional traits in Austrian Brown Swiss cattle.
- Reference method: Multitrait evaluation using all phenotypic data.
- Approximate methods: Multitrait models using yield deviations or de-regressed EBV, and a selection index approach.
- Scenarios with zero, half, or full genetic covariance for residual covariances were tested.
Main Results:
- Approximate multitrait models using yield deviations and de-regressed EBV closely matched the reference method (rank correlations of 1) and were nearly unbiased.
- The selection index method performed well with zero residual covariances but showed decreased correlations and bias with increasing residual covariances.
- EBV derived from the selection index approach were biased when residual covariances were high.
Conclusions:
- Approximate multitrait models, particularly using de-regressed EBV, yield accurate and nearly unbiased results for total merit index.
- Ignoring residual covariances in selection index calculations introduces significant bias, impacting selection accuracy.
- The approximate multitrait approach using de-regressed EBV is suitable for routine genetic evaluations in dairy cattle.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Weighted Mean
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation
On...

