Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 13, 2026

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
Published on: April 6, 2018
Judging Strangers' Trustworthiness is Associated with Theory of Mind Skills
Marie Prevost1, Mathieu Brodeur2, Kristine H Onishi3
1Department of Philosophy, McGill University , Montreal, QC , Canada.
Abstract:
Trusting people requires evaluating them to assess their trustworthiness. Evaluating a stranger's intentions is likely to be one method of assessing trustworthiness. The present study tested the hypothesis that judgments of trustworthiness are associated with mind reading skills, also called theory of mind (ToM). We tested a group of healthy participants and a group of patients with paranoid schizophrenia. Both groups made ToM judgments and judged the trustworthiness of strangers. Participants were also assessed for their disposition to trust as well as levels of paranoid belief. As anticipated, healthy participants had a normal ToM scores and patients with paranoid schizophrenia had poor ToM scores. In paranoid patients, better ability to read others' minds was associated with judging others as more trustworthy, while the reverse was found in the healthy participants (better mind reading was associated with judging others as less trustworthy), suggesting a non-linear relationship between trust in others and being able to read their intentions.
Related Concept Videos
Dark Triad and Person Perception
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Implicit Personality Theories
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes
Understanding Deception

