Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Fisher's Exact Test01:08

Fisher's Exact Test

1.4K
Fisher's exact test is a statistical significance test widely used to analyze 2x2 contingency tables, particularly in situations where sample sizes are small. Unlike the chi-squared test, which approximates P-values and assumes minimum expected frequencies of at least five in each cell, Fisher's exact test calculates the exact probability (P-value) of observing the data or more extreme results under the null hypothesis. This feature makes it especially valuable when the assumptions of...
1.4K
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

7.2K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
7.2K
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

8.9K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n)  to the number of categories (k).
8.9K
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

3.6K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
3.6K
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

609
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
609
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

13.1K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
13.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Performance of Polygenic Risk Scores for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in the All of Us Program.

Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine·2026
Same author

A decision-oriented framework for genomic testing across the prostate cancer continuum.

Cancer genetics·2026
Same author

Polygenic scores for risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: evaluation of novel and published models.

NPJ precision oncology·2026
Same author

Personalized Environment and Genes Study (PEGS) Dataset-a resource for genomic, exposomic, and geospatial data.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

Recommendations for responsible use of population descriptors in polygenic risk score development.

Nature genetics·2025
Same author

Admixture Mapping of Lipid Traits in Hispanic Americans.

Journal of the American Heart Association·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 12, 2026

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
07:15

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

11.5K

Fine Mapping Causal Variants with an Approximate Bayesian Method Using Marginal Test Statistics.

Wenan Chen1, Beth R Larrabee1, Inna G Ovsyannikova2

  • 1Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.

Genetics
|May 8, 2015
PubMed
Summary

We introduce CAVIAR Bayes factor (CAVIARBF), a novel Bayesian fine-mapping method. CAVIARBF offers improved performance and efficiency over existing methods, utilizing only marginal test statistics for genetic association studies.

Keywords:
Bayesian fine mappingcausal variantsmarginal test statistics

More Related Videos

Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA
11:35

Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA

Published on: August 21, 2016

13.7K
Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 12, 2026

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
07:15

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

11.5K
Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA
11:35

Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA

Published on: August 21, 2016

13.7K
Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.7K

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Statistical genetics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Fine-mapping methods like CAVIAR and PAINTOR utilize marginal test statistics and SNP correlations.
  • These methods are likelihood-based, assuming multivariate normality of test statistics.
  • The relationship between these methods and Bayesian fine-mapping approaches, such as BIMBAM, remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify the relationship between CAVIAR, BIMBAM, and Bayesian fine-mapping.
  • To develop a novel Bayesian fine-mapping method using marginal test statistics.
  • To evaluate the performance and efficiency of the new method against existing approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Demonstrated the approximate equivalence of CAVIAR and BIMBAM.
  • Developed CAVIAR Bayes factor (CAVIARBF) within a Bayesian framework.
  • Conducted simulations and applied methods to real genetic data from two independent cohorts.

Main Results:

  • CAVIARBF and BIMBAM showed superior performance compared to PAINTOR and other methods in simulations.
  • CAVIARBF demonstrated comparable accuracy to BIMBAM but was 4-5 times faster.
  • CAVIARBF and BIMBAM exhibited higher consistency in top SNP selection across two independent cohorts than PAINTOR.

Conclusions:

  • CAVIARBF provides an efficient and accurate Bayesian fine-mapping approach.
  • The method effectively integrates association and fine-mapping analyses.
  • CAVIARBF offers a robust alternative for genetic fine-mapping studies.