Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy01:26

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

1.1K
Sigmoidoscopy and laparoscopy are distinct medical procedures that enable physicians to internally inspect different parts of the GI tract. Although they serve different purposes, each is essential for diagnosing and, in some cases, treating various medical conditions.
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Avoiding common bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Surgical technology international·2011
Same author

Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a decade of experience.

Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery·2000
Same author

Laparoscopic surgery: surgical education in the People's Republic of China.

Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy·1994
Same author

Complications of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy.

Surgical endoscopy·1993
Same author

Mini-lap cholecystectomy.

American journal of surgery·1993
Same author

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the pediatric patient.

Journal of pediatric surgery·1991
Same journal

Do Differences in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Robot-Assisted and Navigated Unicompartmental Knee Replacement Achieve Minimal Clinically Important Differences?

Surgical technology international·2025
Same journal

Clinical and Radiological Results of the Integrated Acetabular MUTARS® RS Cup System in the Revision of Geriatric Patients.

Surgical technology international·2025
Same journal

Does Robotic-Assisted Functional Knee Positioning Result in Better Functional Outcomes One Year After Surgery.

Surgical technology international·2025
Same journal

One-Year Clinical Outcomes Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Augmented with a Reinforced Bioinductive Implant.

Surgical technology international·2025
Same journal

In-Office Skin Grafting for Lower Extremity Wounds.

Surgical technology international·2025
Same journal

Revision ACL Reconstruction with Hamstring Autograft from the Contralateral Leg With and Without Internal Brace: A Comparative Study.

Surgical technology international·2025
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 12, 2026

Laparoscopic Repair of Para-Esophageal Hernia Using Absorbable Biosynthetic Mesh
10:52

Laparoscopic Repair of Para-Esophageal Hernia Using Absorbable Biosynthetic Mesh

Published on: September 11, 2021

6.0K

Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy.

D O Olsen1

  • 1Baptist Hospital, Nashville, Tennessee.

Surgical Technology International
|May 8, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair offers potential benefits like reduced pain and faster recovery compared to open surgery. However, questions remain about its long-term recurrence rates and safety compared to traditional methods.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancing Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Tumor Treatment with Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
03:33

Author Spotlight: Advancing Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Tumor Treatment with Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques

Published on: September 27, 2024

1.6K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Pelvic Prolapse Treatment with a Non-Mesh Approach using Laparoscopic Pectopexy
03:30

Author Spotlight: Advancing Pelvic Prolapse Treatment with a Non-Mesh Approach using Laparoscopic Pectopexy

Published on: October 25, 2024

2.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 12, 2026

Laparoscopic Repair of Para-Esophageal Hernia Using Absorbable Biosynthetic Mesh
10:52

Laparoscopic Repair of Para-Esophageal Hernia Using Absorbable Biosynthetic Mesh

Published on: September 11, 2021

6.0K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Tumor Treatment with Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
03:33

Author Spotlight: Advancing Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Tumor Treatment with Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques

Published on: September 27, 2024

1.6K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Pelvic Prolapse Treatment with a Non-Mesh Approach using Laparoscopic Pectopexy
03:30

Author Spotlight: Advancing Pelvic Prolapse Treatment with a Non-Mesh Approach using Laparoscopic Pectopexy

Published on: October 25, 2024

2.9K

Area of Science:

  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • General Surgery
  • Surgical Innovation

Background:

  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy introduced minimally invasive surgery to general surgery.
  • Laparoscopic techniques are being explored for other common procedures, including inguinal hernia repair.
  • Approximately 400,000 inguinal hernia repairs are performed annually in the US.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the potential advantages of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair over conventional open techniques.
  • To address concerns regarding recurrence rates and safety of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.
  • To compare the outcomes of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair.

Main Methods:

  • The study discusses the concept and potential benefits of trans-abdominal laparoscopic repair.
  • It contrasts the technical aspects of laparoscopic and open hernia repairs.
  • It reviews existing data on recurrence rates and morbidity for both approaches.

Main Results:

  • Laparoscopic repair may avoid groin incisions and cord structure mobilization, potentially reducing postoperative pain and long-term morbidity.
  • Open repair is a safe, effective, and often outpatient procedure with low overall morbidity.
  • Recurrence rates for open repair remain high (5-10%) in community settings, similar to historical data.

Conclusions:

  • Laparoscopic repair offers intuitive advantages by avoiding large incisions and cord mobilization.
  • Further research is needed to definitively answer questions about recurrence rates and safety of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.
  • Despite potential benefits, the comparative efficacy of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair requires continued investigation.