Type I, Type II, and Occasionally Type III: How Can We Go Wrong?
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 12, 2026

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms
Published on: September 13, 2018
1Department of Orthopedic Research, Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA.
Abstract:
An important part of planning a study is deciding what risk of drawing incorrect conclusions is acceptable. Type I error occurs when a study draws a false-positive conclusion. A false negative, not appreciating a difference when one exists, is known as type II error. This article reviews the difference between the 2 common types of error and discusses conventions used to set acceptable error levels.
Related Concept Videos
Errors In Hypothesis Tests
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Random and Systematic Errors
Random and Systematic Errors

