Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 12, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Cost-effectiveness analysis of axitinib through a probabilistic decision model
1Open University of Cyprus, Health Care Management Programme , Cyprus , Europe.
Axitinib is a cost-effective option for second-line renal cell carcinoma treatment compared to sorafenib. Despite higher costs, it offers improved outcomes, with a 69.9% probability of cost-effectiveness at a 100,000 euro threshold.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Health Economics
- Pharmacoeconomics
Background:
- The oncology field faces rising demand and expensive new treatments.
- Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is crucial for efficient healthcare decisions.
- CEA guides optimal resource allocation for unmet medical needs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To estimate the cost-effectiveness of axitinib versus sorafenib.
- To evaluate axitinib as a second-line treatment for renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
- To assess the Value of Information (VOI) for decision-making.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive literature review for evidence synthesis.
- A probabilistic Markov model to simulate disease progression.
- Analysis of incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (CEACs).
Main Results:
- Axitinib demonstrated an incremental cost of €87,936 per Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) compared to sorafenib.
- The probability of axitinib being cost-effective was 13% at a €60,000 willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold.
- At a €100,000 WTP threshold, axitinib's cost-effectiveness probability rose to 69.9%.
Conclusions:
- Uncertainty in CEA results stemmed primarily from product price, utility values, and progression-free survival.
- Axitinib presents a potentially cost-effective therapeutic option for second-line RCC treatment.
- The study highlights the importance of CEA in guiding optimal treatment choices in oncology.
Related Concept Videos
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Pharmacodynamic Models: Additive and Proportional Drug Effect Model
Analysis Methods of Pharmacokinetic Data: Model and Model-Independent Approaches
The model approach uses mathematical models to describe changes in drug concentration over time. Pharmacokinetic models help characterize drug behavior in patients, predict drug concentration in the body fluids, calculate optimum dosage regimens, and evaluate the risk of toxicity. However, ensuring that the model fits the experimental data accurately...

