Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

844
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
844
Observational Studies01:11

Observational Studies

11.6K
Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
11.6K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

719
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
719
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

565
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
565
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

731
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
731
Mouse Models of Cancer Study02:43

Mouse Models of Cancer Study

6.8K
Mice have long served as models for studying human biology and pathology because of their phylogenetic and physiological similarity with humans. They are also easy to maintain and breed in the laboratory, and hence, many inbred strains are now available for research. Studies on mice have contributed immeasurably to our understanding of cancer biology.
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...
6.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Metabolic syndrome is associated with increased mortality in patients with breast or prostate cancer.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Breast Cancer, Version 4.2026, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines In Oncology.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN·2026
Same author

Is Mastectomy Necessary in Patients with Occult Breast Cancer and Advanced (N2/N3) Nodal Disease?

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

ASO Visual Abstract: Is Mastectomy Necessary in Patients with Occult Breast Cancer and Advanced (N2/N3) Nodal Disease?

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

Patient-centric Development of Shared Decision-making Aids: The ASSESS Online Personalized Early Breast Cancer Treatment Decision Support Tool and Resource Website.

European journal of breast health·2026
Same author

Disproportionate Risk of Cancer Following Diagnosis of Peripheral Artery Disease.

JACC. Advances·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 12, 2026

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
09:19

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo

Published on: February 6, 2015

9.3K

Comparative effectiveness research in cancer with observational data.

Sharon H Giordano1

  • 1From the Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting
|May 21, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Observational studies are vital for comparative effectiveness research when randomized trials are not feasible. Careful design and analysis can yield valid real-world evidence on treatment benefits and harms.

More Related Videos

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

869
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

1.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 12, 2026

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
09:19

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo

Published on: February 6, 2015

9.3K
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

869
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

1.0K

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Clinical Epidemiology
  • Translational Science

Background:

  • Comparative effectiveness research (CER) increasingly utilizes observational studies.
  • Observational data are crucial when randomized trials are impractical or lack specific populations/outcomes.
  • Oncology possesses rich observational databases suitable for CER.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the value and methodology of observational studies in CER.
  • To emphasize the importance of rigorous study design in minimizing bias.
  • To discuss analytical techniques for addressing confounding in observational research.

Main Methods:

  • Careful attention to study design to mitigate selection bias.
  • Application of advanced analytic techniques, including multivariable regression, propensity score analysis, and instrumental variable analysis.
  • Leveraging large, clinically rich observational databases, particularly in oncology.

Main Results:

  • Observational studies, when meticulously designed, can minimize selection bias.
  • Analytical methods effectively address confounding factors inherent in observational data.
  • Valid real-world evidence on treatment benefits and harms can be generated.

Conclusions:

  • Observational studies are essential for CER, providing insights into real-world populations.
  • Rigorous design and appropriate analytical strategies ensure the validity of findings.
  • These studies offer a powerful approach to assessing interventions when randomized trials are limited.