Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 12, 2026

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
Fracture toughness testing: A discriminatory mechanical testing performance indicator for glass-ionomer restoratives?
Mirza Shahzad Baig1, Charles H Lloyd2, Garry J P Fleming1
1Materials Science Unit, Dublin Dental University Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Objectives:
To investigate the single-edge notched (SEN) bend fracture toughness (KIC) testing methodology as a reproducible and discriminatory mechanical testing protocol for encapsulated and hand-mixed glass-ionomers (GI).
Methods:
SEN bend test-pieces (35.0±0.1mm length, 6.0±0.1mm width, 3.0±0.1mm thickness with a sharp notch formed at mid-length by embedding a scalpel blade) were prepared for KIC testing using three encapsulated GI products (Chemfil Rock, Fuji IXGP Fast Capsule and Ionofil Molar AC). In addition, test-pieces were prepared from a hand-mixed GI product (Ionofil Molar) which contained between 100% and 20% of the manufacturer's recommended powder content (in 10% decrements) for a constant weight of liquid. Groups of 20 test-pieces were prepared for each encapsulated GI product (n=3) and hand-mixed GI powder:liquid mixing ratio (n=9). Data were statistically analyzed and the coefficients of variation (CoV) determined for each encapsulated GI product and hand-mixed GI powder:liquid mixing ratio.
Results:
The KIC testing methodology failed to discriminate between the encapsulated GI products that were investigated (p=0.225). For the hand-mixed GI, the KIC testing methodology also failed to discriminate between the powder:liquid mixing ratios investigated (R(2)=0.576). The pooled CoV (10%) for the encapsulated GI products and for the powder:liquid mixing ratio groups (12%) identified the reproducibility of the test for this experiment. For the hand-mixed GI mixing ratio groups with between 100% to 50% of the recommended powder content, no trend could be discerned.
Significance:
The KIC testing methodology failed to discriminate between different encapsulated GI products and hand-mixed GI powder:liquid mixing ratio groups investigated, despite KIC being an intrinsic material property and the coefficient of variation being acceptable.
Related Concept Videos
Stress-Strain Diagram - Brittle Materials
Toughness and Hardness of Aggregate
Mechanical Characteristics of Steel
The tension test is fundamental for determining tensile strength. In this test, a steel specimen is stretched using a gripping device until it breaks. The data collected during this test are used...
Fiber Reinforced Concrete

