Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Author Spotlight: The Box-Cavity Cortical Approach for Enhanced Evaluation of Biomaterials and Bone Regeneration
Published on: November 21, 2023
Osteocyte lacunar properties in rat cortical bone: Differences between lamellar and central bone
Fiona Linnea Bach-Gansmo1, James C Weaver2, Mads Hartmann Jensen1
1iNANO and Department of Chemistry, Aarhus University, Gustav Wieds Vej 14, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
This study compared the shapes and positions of small cavities (lacunae) where osteocytes live in two types of rat cortical bone: lamellar and central. Using advanced 3D imaging techniques, the researchers found that while the size of the cavities was similar in both bone types, their shapes and arrangements differed. In central bone, the cavities appeared disordered in 2D images but were actually aligned along the bone’s length in 3D. The study highlights the importance of using 3D imaging to understand bone structure accurately and shows that the organization of bone affects the spatial arrangement of osteocytes.
Area of Science:
- Bone histomorphometry in skeletal biology
- Osteocyte biology within musculoskeletal research
- Computed tomography applications in biomedical imaging
Background:
Osteocytes are embedded in a complex network of lacunae and canaliculi within cortical bone. Recent studies have focused on how lacunar geometry influences osteocyte function. However, significant variability in reported lacunar properties across species and bone regions remains a challenge. Prior research has shown that osteocyte lacunae vary in shape, orientation, and density depending on the bone's structural organization. It was already known that lamellar bone has a more ordered structure compared to central bone regions. That uncertainty drove the need to investigate whether these structural differences correlate with distinct lacunar properties. No prior work had resolved how 3D imaging might clarify apparent 2D misalignments in osteocyte lacunae. This gap motivated the use of high-resolution imaging to distinguish between lamellar and central bone types in rat cortical bone.
Purpose Of The Study:
This study aimed to compare osteocyte lacunar properties in lamellar and central regions of rat cortical bone. The specific problem addressed is the lack of clarity regarding how bone structural organization affects lacunar geometry. The motivation stems from the need to understand how osteocyte function is influenced by their spatial arrangement. By using advanced imaging techniques, the researchers sought to clarify whether differences in bone organization lead to distinct lacunar characteristics. The study focused on lacunar volume, shape, orientation, and density as key parameters. The goal was to determine if lamellar and central bone types exhibit measurable differences in these properties. The researchers also aimed to assess the value of 3D imaging in revealing structural alignments not visible in 2D cross sections. This work contributes to the broader effort to link osteocyte morphology with bone function.
Main Methods:
The researchers used synchrotron radiation micro computed tomography (SR μCT) and backscattered electron (BE) microscopy to analyze osteocyte lacunae in rat cortical bone. SR μCT provided high-resolution 3D images of the bone matrix, allowing detailed quantification of lacunar geometry. BE microscopy was used to complement the SR μCT data by offering additional morphological insights. The study focused on two distinct bone regions: circumferential lamellar bone and a central, more disordered bone type. Quantitative measurements included lacunar volume, shape, orientation, and density. The 3D data sets were analyzed to assess the spatial alignment of lacunae along the bone's long axis. Statistical comparisons were made between the lamellar and central bone regions to identify significant differences. These methods enabled a comprehensive assessment of lacunar properties in different bone structures.
Main Results:
The study found no significant differences in lacunar volumes between lamellar and central bone regions. However, significant differences were observed in lacunar orientation, shape, and density. Lacunae in central bone appeared disordered in 2D cross sections but were found to be highly aligned along the bone's long axis in 3D reconstructions. The shape of lacunae in central bone was more variable compared to the more uniform shapes in lamellar bone. Lacunar density was higher in lamellar bone than in central bone. These findings suggest that bone structural organization influences the spatial arrangement of osteocytes. The 3D alignment of lacunae in central bone was unexpected based on 2D imaging alone. The use of SR μCT revealed previously undetected patterns in lacunar orientation.
Conclusions:
The authors conclude that 3D imaging is essential for accurately assessing osteocyte lacunar orientation in bone. They emphasize that 2D imaging may misrepresent the true alignment of lacunae in disordered bone regions. The study demonstrates that lamellar and central bone types differ in lacunar orientation, shape, and density. These differences suggest that bone structural organization affects osteocyte spatial distribution. The researchers propose that the apparent disorder in central bone is an artifact of 2D imaging limitations. They highlight the importance of selecting appropriate imaging subregions for high-resolution studies. The findings support the need for 3D methods in analyzing anisotropic biological materials like bone. The authors suggest that future studies should consider the impact of imaging techniques on morphometric interpretations.
Frequently Asked Questions
The main finding is that lacunae in central bone appear disordered in 2D but are highly aligned along the bone's long axis in 3D.
The study used synchrotron radiation micro computed tomography (SR μCT) and backscattered electron (BE) microscopy.
3D imaging reveals true alignment patterns that 2D imaging may misrepresent, especially in disordered bone regions.
Lamellar bone has more uniform lacunar shapes and higher density compared to central bone.
No significant differences in lacunar volume were found between lamellar and central bone.
The authors propose that the appropriate choice of subregions for high-resolution imaging is not trivial and affects results.
Related Concept Videos
Compact Bone
Compact bone, also called cortical bone, is the denser, stronger of the two types of bone tissue. It is found under the periosteum and in the diaphyses of long bones, where it provides support and protection. The microscopic structural unit of compact bone is called an osteon, or haversian system. Each osteon is composed of concentric rings of calcified...
Spongy Bone
Spongy bone is more porous, and less dense compared to compact bone. It is composed of concentric lamellae that are arranged irregularly to form the trabecular network. In some bones, the spaces between trabeculae contain red marrow, where...
Bone Structure
Bone as Supporting Connective Tissue
Bone Matrix
Bone, or osseous tissue, is a connective tissue that has a large amount of two different types of matrix material. The organic matrix is similar to the matrix material found in other connective tissues, including some amount of collagen and elastic fibers. This gives strength and flexibility to the tissue. The inorganic matrix consists of mineral salts— mostly calcium salts—...
Gross Anatomy of Bone
The diaphysis is the tubular shaft that runs between the proximal and distal ends of the bone. The walls of the diaphysis are composed of dense and hard compact bone made of numerous osteons — the functional unit of the compact bone. The hollow region in the diaphysis is called the medullary cavity, which harbors the bone marrow. In infants and children, this marrow cavity is filled with red marrow, whereas in...
The Bone Matrix

