Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
Published on: October 11, 2018
Optimal Thresholding of Classifiers to Maximize F1 Measure
Zachary C Lipton1, Charles Elkan2, Balakrishnan Naryanaswamy3
1University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0404, USA, zlipton@cs.ucsd.edu.
Abstract:
This paper provides new insight into maximizing F1 measures in the context of binary classification and also in the context of multilabel classification. The harmonic mean of precision and recall, the F1 measure is widely used to evaluate the success of a binary classifier when one class is rare. Micro average, macro average, and per instance average F1 measures are used in multilabel classification. For any classifier that produces a real-valued output, we derive the relationship between the best achievable F1 value and the decision-making threshold that achieves this optimum. As a special case, if the classifier outputs are well-calibrated conditional probabilities, then the optimal threshold is half the optimal F1 value. As another special case, if the classifier is completely uninformative, then the optimal behavior is to classify all examples as positive. When the actual prevalence of positive examples is low, this behavior can be undesirable. As a case study, we discuss the results, which can be surprising, of maximizing F1 when predicting 26,853 labels for Medline documents.
Related Concept Videos
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
F Distribution
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

