Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Neural Circuits01:25

Neural Circuits

3.3K
Neural circuits and neuronal pools are two of the main structures found in the nervous system. Neural circuits are networks of neurons that work together to carry out a specific task or process. They consist of interconnected neurons and glial cells, which provide structural and metabolic support.
Neuronal pools are collections of nerve cells with similar functions and interact through chemical and electrical signals. These pools include both interneurons (the central neural circuit nodes that...
3.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Why do we seek information about the future? On the origins of subjective value without instrumental value.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Beast3D: Animal behavioral analysis and neural encoding from multi-view video via Gaussian splatting.

ArXiv·2026
Same author

Lightning Pose 3D: an uncertainty-aware framework for data-efficient multi-view animal pose estimation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Computational optimization of two-photon holographic stimulation sites<i>in vivo</i>.

Journal of neural engineering·2026
Same author

Animal behavioral analysis and neural encoding with transformer-based self-supervised pretraining.

ArXiv·2026
Same author

20 lessons in team science: Learning from the experience of the International Brain Laboratory.

Neuron·2026
Same journal

Detection, communication, and individual identification with deep audio embeddings: A case study with North Atlantic right whales.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Exploring the structural lexicon of the Proteome via Metric Geometry.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Linking retinal sampling in neural encoding models to temporal profiles of visual processing in humans.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

CAdir: Joint clustering of cells and genes for single-cell transcriptomics with visualization-driven cluster quality assessment.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Systematic design of auxotrophic strains and media conditions to probe metabolic functions in E. coli.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Neuronal excitability and parameter variability in the Hodgkin-Huxley model.

PLoS computational biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Simultaneous Scalp Electroencephalography EEG, Electromyography EMG, and Whole-body Segmental Inertial Recording for Multi-modal Neural Decoding
11:25

Simultaneous Scalp Electroencephalography EEG, Electromyography EMG, and Whole-body Segmental Inertial Recording for Multi-modal Neural Decoding

Published on: July 26, 2013

44.3K

Encoder-decoder optimization for brain-computer interfaces.

Josh Merel1, Donald M Pianto2, John P Cunningham3

  • 1Neurobiology and Behavior Program, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.

Plos Computational Biology
|June 2, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) involve user and system adaptation for better control. This study presents a framework showing optimal user learning with a fixed decoder matches co-adaptation performance, validated in a BCI simulator.

More Related Videos

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

9.7K
A Single-Channel and Non-Invasive Wearable Brain-Computer Interface for Industry and Healthcare
06:34

A Single-Channel and Non-Invasive Wearable Brain-Computer Interface for Industry and Healthcare

Published on: July 7, 2023

3.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Simultaneous Scalp Electroencephalography EEG, Electromyography EMG, and Whole-body Segmental Inertial Recording for Multi-modal Neural Decoding
11:25

Simultaneous Scalp Electroencephalography EEG, Electromyography EMG, and Whole-body Segmental Inertial Recording for Multi-modal Neural Decoding

Published on: July 26, 2013

44.3K
Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

9.7K
A Single-Channel and Non-Invasive Wearable Brain-Computer Interface for Industry and Healthcare
06:34

A Single-Channel and Non-Invasive Wearable Brain-Computer Interface for Industry and Healthcare

Published on: July 7, 2023

3.5K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Computer Science

Background:

  • Neuroprosthetic brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) decode neural activity for effector control.
  • Both user learning and decoder adaptation can improve BCI performance.
  • Co-adaptation involves simultaneous user learning and decoder adaptation to neural patterns.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a mathematical framework for co-adaptation in BCIs.
  • To relate co-adaptation to the joint optimization of user encoding models and decoder parameters.
  • To demonstrate an approach for optimizing decoders and user learning for enhanced BCI performance.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a mathematical framework for co-adaptation.
  • Defined co-adaptation as joint optimization of user's control scheme and decoder parameters.
  • Used numerical methods to derive an optimized decoder.
  • Validated the approach using a model BCI system with an online prosthesis simulator and a human-in-the-loop psychophysics setup.

Main Results:

  • Co-adaptation does not outperform an optimal fixed decoder coupled with optimal user learning under specific framework assumptions.
  • Users can learn control schemes (encoders) matched to fixed, optimal decoders.
  • The proposed approach demonstrated expected performance advantages in simulations.

Conclusions:

  • Optimal user learning with a fixed, optimized decoder can achieve performance comparable to co-adaptation.
  • The study validates that users can adapt their control strategies to optimal decoders.
  • The developed methods offer a pathway to enhance BCI system performance through optimized decoder selection and user training.