Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 11, 2026
05:25
Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise
Published on: March 29, 2019
10.1K
Why leaders punish: A power perspective.
Marlon Mooijman1, Wilco W van Dijk1, Naomi Ellemers1
1Department of Social and Organizational Psychology, Leiden University.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
|June 2, 2015
Summary
Power shifts leaders
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Organizational Behavior
- Behavioral Economics
Background:
- Leadership and power dynamics significantly influence decision-making processes.
- Understanding punishment motives is crucial for effective governance and organizational management.
- Existing theories on punishment often overlook the nuanced impact of power.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose and test a theoretical model explaining how power influences leaders' punishment motives.
- To investigate the mediating role of distrust in the relationship between power and punishment.
- To differentiate between deterrence and "just deserts" as punishment rationales under varying power conditions.
Main Methods:
- Nine empirical studies were conducted using diverse power manipulations and distrust measures.
- Participants' punishment motives (deterrence vs. just deserts) were assessed across various scenarios.
- Recommended punishments were evaluated, including public sanctions and mandatory minimums.
Main Results:
- Power significantly increases leaders' reliance on deterrence as a motive for punishment.
- This shift is mediated by power-induced distrust, fostering a more suspicious mindset.
- Leaders with power favored deterrence-based punishments like public shaming and mandatory sanctions.
Conclusions:
- Power fundamentally alters the rationale behind punishment, prioritizing deterrence over retribution.
- Leaders' distrust, amplified by power, drives the adoption of specific punitive strategies.
- Findings have implications for leadership training, policy-making, and the study of power and trust.
Related Concept Videos
02:20Milgram's Obedience to Authority
7.8K
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
7.8K
03:20The Stanford Prison Experiment
25.1K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
25.1K
01:34Groupthink
50.3K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
50.3K
01:08Obedience
35.8K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
35.8K
01:27Punishment
1.3K
Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior....
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior....
1.3K
01:27Secondary Motives: Power Motivation and Achievement Motivation
732
Power motivation and achievement motivation are two essential social motives identified by psychologist David McClelland. These motives influence behavior in various personal and professional contexts, shaping how individuals interact with others and pursue their goals.
Power motivation is characterized by the desire to influence, control, or have an impact on others. It is shaped by an individual's experiences, social environment, and cultural context. People with high power motivation are...
Power motivation is characterized by the desire to influence, control, or have an impact on others. It is shaped by an individual's experiences, social environment, and cultural context. People with high power motivation are...
732