Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 11, 2026

14:13
A Training Program Using an Agility Ladder for Community-Dwelling Older Adults
Published on: March 7, 2020
11.7K
Effects of different agility training programs among first-grade elementary school students
Collegium Antropologicum
|June 5, 2015
Summary
Low contextual interference agility training significantly improved first-grade students' performance more than moderate or high interference programs. Physical education teachers can use these findings to design more effective agility training for young children.
Area of Science:
- Sports Science
- Pediatric Exercise Science
- Motor Learning
Background:
- Agility is crucial for physical development in children.
- Contextual interference in training influences motor skill acquisition.
- Optimizing agility training programs for primary school students is essential for physical education.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of low, moderate, and high contextual interference agility training programs.
- To provide evidence-based recommendations for physical education teachers designing agility programs for young children.
Main Methods:
- 57 first-grade students were randomized into three groups: low, moderate, and high contextual interference.
- Participants underwent a 4-week agility training intervention.
- Agility performance was assessed before and after the intervention period.
Main Results:
- Significant agility improvements were observed in the low (p < 0.01) and moderate (p < 0.05) contextual interference groups.
- The low contextual interference group demonstrated superior improvements compared to the moderate group.
- No significant agility improvements were found in the high contextual interference group (p > 0.05).
Conclusions:
- Low contextual interference agility training is more effective for improving agility in first-grade primary school students.
- Physical education teachers should consider low contextual interference strategies for designing effective agility programs for this age group.
