Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Wave-optics simulation model for full-field modulation-based tensor tomography using a random wavefront modulator.

Optics express·2026
Same author

STING dampens the unfolded protein response to enable the presentation of self-antigens on MHC-I during inflammation.

Cell reports·2026
Same author

LRRK2 mutations block NCOA4 trafficking upon iron overload leading to ferroptotic death.

Journal of cell science·2026
Same author

Targeting the H/KRAS α4-β6-α5 Allosteric Lobe with Macrocyclic Peptides.

ACS medicinal chemistry letters·2026
Same author

Relation of blood-based inflammation conditional networks to key immune health status and Alzheimer's biomarkers in aging adults.

Neurobiology of aging·2026
Same author

Noncanonical Transcription and Splicing Shape the Colorectal Cancer Immunopeptidome in MSI and MSS Tumors.

Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP·2026
Same journal

From Method-Defined Signals to Reference Measurement Procedures: Two Decades of Mass Spectrometry-Based ProGRP Quantification.

Journal of proteome research·2026
Same journal

Proteomic Profiling of Extracellular Vesicle-Enriched Plasma Using Mag-Net for Biomarker Discovery in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Journal of proteome research·2026
Same journal

Computationally Efficient Bayesian Estimation of Graphical Networks for Omics Data.

Journal of proteome research·2026
Same journal

Hierarchy of MS-Based Evidence.

Journal of proteome research·2026
Same journal

Proteomic Profiling of Exosomes from HPV-Positive and HPV-Negative Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Selective Cargo Packaging.

Journal of proteome research·2026
Same journal

Proteomic Analysis Identifies ATE1-Dependent Arginylation Dysregulation across Meningioma Grades.

Journal of proteome research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Phosphopeptide Enrichment Coupled with Label-free Quantitative Mass Spectrometry to Investigate the Phosphoproteome in Prostate Cancer
12:23

Phosphopeptide Enrichment Coupled with Label-free Quantitative Mass Spectrometry to Investigate the Phosphoproteome in Prostate Cancer

Published on: August 2, 2018

12.9K

Sample Collection Method Bias Effects in Quantitative Phosphoproteomics.

Evgeny Kanshin1, Michael Tyers1,2, Pierre Thibault1,3

  • 1†Institute for Research in Immunology and Cancer, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, Succursale centre-ville, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada.

Journal of Proteome Research
|June 5, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Sample collection methods impact protein phosphorylation analysis. While many methods yield similar phosphopeptides, cold phosphate buffer unexpectedly activates signaling, potentially biasing results in phosphoproteomics studies.

Keywords:
Saccharomyces cerevisiaeosmotic shockphosphoproteomicsquantitative proteomicssample collection

More Related Videos

Quantitative Phosphoproteomics in Fatty Acid Stimulated Saccharomyces cerevisiae
15:41

Quantitative Phosphoproteomics in Fatty Acid Stimulated Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Published on: October 12, 2009

10.6K
Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification
10:37

Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification

Published on: November 15, 2017

12.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Phosphopeptide Enrichment Coupled with Label-free Quantitative Mass Spectrometry to Investigate the Phosphoproteome in Prostate Cancer
12:23

Phosphopeptide Enrichment Coupled with Label-free Quantitative Mass Spectrometry to Investigate the Phosphoproteome in Prostate Cancer

Published on: August 2, 2018

12.9K
Quantitative Phosphoproteomics in Fatty Acid Stimulated Saccharomyces cerevisiae
15:41

Quantitative Phosphoproteomics in Fatty Acid Stimulated Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Published on: October 12, 2009

10.6K
Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification
10:37

Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification

Published on: November 15, 2017

12.9K

Area of Science:

  • Proteomics
  • Cellular signaling
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • Advances in mass spectrometry (MS) enable large-scale phosphosite identification.
  • Maintaining in vivo protein phosphorylation during sample preparation is crucial.
  • Phosphatase inhibitors and denaturing conditions are standard for preserving phosphorylation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if upstream cell collection techniques alter global protein phosphorylation.
  • To evaluate the impact of different sample preparation workflows on phosphorylation status.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of various cell harvesting protocols (ice-cold phosphate buffer, cold ethanol, trichloroacetic acid, liquid nitrogen).
  • Utilized metabolic labeling and quantitative mass spectrometry.
  • Analysis performed on Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cultures.

Main Results:

  • Highly similar phosphopeptides were identified across different harvesting methods.
  • Quantitative analysis revealed unexpected activation of signaling events by cold phosphate buffer.
  • Identified potential for systematic bias in phosphoproteomics measurements.

Conclusions:

  • Cell collection methods can influence phosphorylation signaling.
  • Cold phosphate buffer may introduce bias in phosphoproteomics and biochemical analyses.
  • Careful selection of sample collection protocols is essential for accurate phosphoproteomics data.