Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 21, 2026

Remote Magnetic Navigation for Accurate, Real-time Catheter Positioning and Ablation in Cardiac Electrophysiology Procedures
Published on: April 21, 2013
[Bedside cardiac catheterization. Advantages and disadvantages]
Insights
Bedside heart catheterization (BHC) is a valuable diagnostic tool for complicated myocardial infarction (MI). While minor and major complications occurred, the procedure was successful in most patients, aiding in diagnosis and management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Diagnostic Procedures
- Critical Care Medicine
Context:
- Bedside heart catheterization (BHC) was performed on 300 patients between 1973 and 1985.
- The study population primarily consisted of patients who had suffered a myocardial infarction (MI), with many in advanced Killip functional classes (II-IV).
- A subset of patients underwent BHC due to congestive heart failure.
Purpose:
- To evaluate the advantages and risks associated with bedside heart catheterization (BHC).
- To assess the diagnostic utility of wedge pressure (WP) measurements in patients with MI and heart failure.
- To identify factors associated with complications during BHC.
Summary:
- BHC was successful in 96% of cases, with wedge pressure (WP) measured in 78.7%.
- A significant proportion of patients, even in higher functional classes, had WP < 18 mmHg, indicating the procedure's value in complex MI cases.
- Minor complications occurred in 11% and major complications in 15%, including pulmonary infarction and phlebitis. Longer procedure maintenance time was linked to increased complications.
Impact:
- Highlights the utility of BHC in diagnosing and managing complicated myocardial infarction and heart failure.
- Identifies pulmonary infarction and phlebitis as key complications associated with prolonged BHC procedures.
- Provides insights into the hemodynamic profiles of MI patients, challenging traditional assumptions about wedge pressure thresholds.
Abstract:
Three hundred patients submitted to bedside heart catheterization (BHC) from 1973 to 1985 were studied, in order to assess advantages and risks of the procedure. Two-hundred and sixty seven patients (89%) suffered a myocardial infarction (MI) and 146 of them were in functional class (Killip) II, 36 in FC III and 71 in FC IV. Thirty cases were submitted to BHC due to congestive heart failure. BHC was successful in 288 patients (96%) and the wedge pressure (WP) could be measured in 236 cases (78.7%). The WP was less than 18 mmHg in 47.2% of the patients in FC II, in 44.9% of the patients in FC III and in 35.3% of those in FC IV. Minor complications occurred in 33 cases (11.0%); balloon rupture in 12 (4.0%), transient arrhythmias in 11 (3.7%) and lumen obstruction in another 10 cases (3.3%). Forty five patients (15.0%) presented major complications related to the procedure: pulmonary infarction (PI) in 18 cases (6%), phlebitis in 15 cases (5%), sustained arrhythmias in 10 cases (3.3%), pulmonary artery rupture and endocarditis each in 1 case. The mean age between the group of patients with and without complications was similar the maintenance time as greater in the group of patients with complications: 3.4 +/- 0.2 vs 2.7 +/- 0.1 days (p less than 0.05). We concluded that many patients with clinical evidence of heart failure had WP smaller than 18 mmHg, emphasizing the value of the procedure in patients with complicated MI. The maintenance time was associated with the occurrence of complications, mainly PI and phlebitis.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Holter Monitor: 24-Hour Monitoring
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management

