Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

46.4K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
46.4K
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other01:20

Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other

404
According to George Herbert Mead, as children progress beyond the game stage, they develop a more comprehensive understanding of societal rules and norms. This cognitive and social development enables them to internalize the expectations of the broader community, refining their ability to regulate behavior.Consistent participation in organized activities is crucial in helping children recognize that their actions are not isolated but contribute to a more significant, interconnected group...
404
Social Foundations of Self I: Play and Game01:24

Social Foundations of Self I: Play and Game

322
The development of self in children is deeply rooted in social interactions, mainly through stages of play and structured games. These stages, outlined by sociologist George Herbert Mead, illustrate how children progressively learn to understand and adopt social roles, forming a cohesive sense of self.The Play Stage: Imitation and Simple Role-TakingIn the early years of childhood, the play stage is characterized by imitative behavior, where children engage in role-playing based on familiar...
322
Relationship with Other Adult Family Members and Siblings01:29

Relationship with Other Adult Family Members and Siblings

254
Other adult family members and siblings play a crucial role in shaping children’s social and emotional development. While parents or primary caregivers are often the central figures in early attachment and socialization, other adults in a child’s life, such as grandparents, aunts, and uncles, can significantly influence developmental outcomes. These influences depend on each adult’s personality and may help compensate when a primary caregiver is emotionally distant or...
254
Social Relationships and Well-Being01:30

Social Relationships and Well-Being

480
The significance of social relationships in psychological well-being is a well-established area of inquiry within social psychology. Research consistently demonstrates that the presence of meaningful, supportive relationships enhances emotional health, while the absence or deterioration of such connections can contribute to psychological distress. Relationships serve as a foundation for emotional support, identity, and social belonging, all of which are critical to an individual’s overall...
480
Friendships and Close Friendships01:20

Friendships and Close Friendships

303
Friendship formation is a dynamic process shaped by psychological, cultural, and social factors. Friendships play a crucial role in emotional well-being, social development, and personal identity from childhood to adulthood.Childhood and Early FriendshipsFriendships in childhood often arise due to shared environments, such as school or neighborhood interactions. At this stage, proximity and common interests serve as the primary basis for connection. As children grow, their friendships evolve...
303

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Behavioural repertoires in moving crowds: an observational approach.

Royal Society open science·2025
Same author

Let's Talk About Condoms: Social Engagement in a Sexual Health Intervention Targeting Young Adults in Denmark.

International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health·2024
Same author

Unraveling Image and Justice Concerns: A Social Identity Account on Appraisals and Emotional Drivers of High-Status Transgressor Group Members' Solidarity With Low-Status Groups.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2024
Same author

How perceived polarization predicts attitude moralization (and vice versa): A four-wave longitudinal study during the 2020 U.S. election.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2024
Same author

The sound of silence: The importance of bystander support for confronters in the prevention of norm erosion.

The British journal of social psychology·2023
Same author

Feeling heard: Operationalizing a key concept for social relations.

PloS one·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 11, 2026

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
11:13

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

Published on: November 19, 2015

14.7K

Uniform and Complementary Social Interaction: Distinct Pathways to Solidarity.

Namkje Koudenburg1, Tom Postmes1, Ernestine H Gordijn1

  • 1University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Plos One
|June 6, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Coordinated action fosters solidarity. Complementary actions enhance solidarity through personal value, while uniform actions increase solidarity via commonality, impacting individual group positions.

More Related Videos

Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors
06:41

Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors

Published on: February 25, 2011

95.8K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 11, 2026

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
11:13

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

Published on: November 19, 2015

14.7K
Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors
06:41

Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors

Published on: February 25, 2011

95.8K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Group Dynamics

Background:

  • Co-action, or acting together, is fundamental to group formation and function.
  • Understanding the nuances of how different co-action types influence group solidarity is crucial for group cohesion.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how distinct forms of co-action (uniform vs. complementary) generate feelings of solidarity.
  • To explore the differential psychological mechanisms underlying solidarity emergence in various co-action contexts.

Main Methods:

  • Five empirical studies were conducted, incorporating both laboratory and field settings.
  • Participants engaged in uniform (synchronous) or complementary (alternating) co-action tasks.
  • Statistical mediation analyses were employed to examine the role of personal value.

Main Results:

  • Both uniform and complementary co-action significantly increased solidarity compared to control conditions.
  • Complementary co-action's effect on solidarity was mediated by an enhanced sense of personal value to the group.
  • Uniform co-action's impact on solidarity was not mediated by personal value, suggesting a reliance on commonality.

Conclusions:

  • Different forms of co-action lead to solidarity through distinct pathways.
  • Complementary actions foster solidarity by enhancing individual self-worth within the group.
  • Uniform actions promote solidarity through shared experience and commonality, with less emphasis on individual contribution.