Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

11.3K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
11.3K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

10.6K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
10.6K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

11.1K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
11.1K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

12.6K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
12.6K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

9.4K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
9.4K
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

3.6K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
3.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Social Hair Plucking's Associations with Other Behaviors and Its Health Considerations, in Captive Rhesus Macaques (<i>Macaca mulatta</i>).

Journal of applied animal welfare science : JAAWS·2026
Same author

Wolf Presence Disrupts Seasonal Variation in Hair Cortisol Among Free-Ranging Beef Cattle.

Ecology and evolution·2026
Same author

Ethological scars? Exposure to multiple negative events over a lifespan may predict abnormal repetitive behaviour in laboratory-housed rhesus macaques.

Biology letters·2026
Same author

The social circumstances of the maternal experience and its biobehavioral associations, in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Animal reproduction science·2026
Same author

Establishing a Predictable Cue for Catches to Reduce Reactivity to Management Events for Captive Rhesus Macaques (<i>Macaca mulatta</i>).

Applied animal behaviour science·2026
Same author

Food Distribution, But Not Market Forces, Predict Behavioral Social Tolerance in Rhesus Macaques.

American journal of primatology·2025
Same journal

Computational modelling distinguishes diverse contributors to aneurysmal progression in the Marfan aorta.

Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2025
Same journal

Inferring the shape of data: a probabilistic framework for analysing experiments in the natural sciences.

Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2023
Same journal

The Elbert range of magnetostrophic convection. I. Linear theory.

Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2022
Same journal

Soft wetting with (a)symmetric Shuttleworth effect.

Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2022
Same journal

The quantum theory of time: a calculus for q-numbers.

Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2022
Same journal

Integrable nonlinear evolution equations in three spatial dimensions.

Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2022
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 11, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.8K

Computing a ranking network with confidence bounds from a graph-based Beta random field.

Hsieh Fushing1, Michael P McAssey2, Brenda McCowan3

  • 1Departments of Statistics , University of California , Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

Proceedings. Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences
|June 9, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new computational method to accurately rank social hierarchies by considering network relevance and chance effects. It improves ranking accuracy for complex datasets, outperforming traditional methods.

Keywords:
Beta random fieldinformation transitivitynonlinear ranking hierarchypaired comparisonrhesus macaque

More Related Videos

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
05:55

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

1.7K
Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks
11:18

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks

Published on: March 2, 2015

11.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 11, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.8K
Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
05:55

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

1.7K
Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks
11:18

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks

Published on: March 2, 2015

11.0K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Social Science
  • Network Analysis
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Determining accurate social hierarchies is crucial but challenged by data limitations and uncertainty.
  • Existing methods often overlook network relevance and the impact of chance on ranking outcomes.
  • Understanding dominance and conflict in social networks requires robust analytical frameworks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel computational approach for constructing robust ranking hierarchies from pairwise conflict data.
  • To address the fundamental issues of identifying relevant network information and quantifying the effect of chance.
  • To provide a method that accounts for uncertainty arising from limited data and data heterogeneity.

Main Methods:

  • Constructed a random field with Beta distributions from pairwise conflict outcomes to model uncertainty.
  • Evaluated network information using information transitivity and synthesized transitive dominance odds.
  • Fused direct and indirect dominance information using coupled random matrices and simulated annealing for optimal ranking networks.

Main Results:

  • Developed a computational approach suitable for large, heterogeneous datasets of conflict outcomes.
  • Demonstrated the infeasibility of classical maximum-likelihood approaches due to ignored network information.
  • Derived conditional statistical inferences to manifest the effect of uncertainty on network features.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed method effectively integrates relevant network information and accounts for chance, leading to more accurate social hierarchy rankings.
  • This approach offers a significant improvement over traditional methods by explicitly handling uncertainty and data heterogeneity.
  • Validated on real-world datasets from college football and rhesus macaque societies, showcasing its practical applicability.