Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Adverse prognostic value of persistent office blood pressure elevation in white coat hypertension
Giuseppe Mancia1, Rita Facchetti2, Guido Grassi2
1From the Department of Health Sciences (G.M., M.B., R.F., G.G.) and Clinica Medica (M.B., G.G.), University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy (G.M.); and IRCCS Multimedica, Sesto San Giovanni, Milan, Italy (G.G.). giuseppe.mancia@unimib.it.
Insights
Persistent high office blood pressure in white coat hypertension (WCH) indicates increased cardiovascular mortality risk. Unstable WCH does not significantly alter mortality risk, highlighting the importance of monitoring office BP for risk stratification.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Hypertension Research
- Public Health
Background:
- Cardiovascular risk stratification is crucial for managing white coat hypertension (WCH).
- WCH involves elevated office blood pressure (BP) with normal ambulatory BP.
- Identifying individuals needing closer monitoring or treatment is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess long-term cardiovascular and all-cause mortality risk in stable and unstable WCH.
- To compare risks between WCH subtypes and a normotensive group.
- To determine the prognostic relevance of office BP in WCH.
Main Methods:
- Longitudinal study (>16 years) of a general population sample in Monza, Italy.
- Categorization into normotensive, unstable WCH, and stable WCH groups.
- Analysis of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, adjusted for confounders including ambulatory BP.
Main Results:
- Stable WCH was associated with significantly increased cardiovascular (HR 1.6) and all-cause mortality (HR 1.92) compared to normotensives.
- Unstable WCH did not show a significant difference in mortality risk.
- Office BP independently predicted mortality, irrespective of ambulatory BP thresholds used.
Conclusions:
- Persistent elevation in office BP in WCH signifies an increased long-term mortality risk.
- Office BP measurements are prognostically relevant in WCH.
- Repeated office BP monitoring is clinically important for accurate risk assessment in WCH.
Abstract:
Stratification of cardiovascular risk is of fundamental importance in white coat hypertension (WCH) to identify individuals in need of closer follow-up and perhaps antihypertensive drug treatment. In subjects representative of the general population of Monza (Italy), the risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality was assessed >16 years in stable and unstable WCH individuals, that is, those in whom ambulatory blood pressure (BP) normality was associated with a persistent or nonpersistent office BP elevation at 2 consecutive visits, respectively. Data were compared with those from an entirely normotensive group, that is, ambulatory and persistent office BP normality. Compared with the normotensive group, the risk of cardiovascular and all-cause death was not significantly different in unstable WCH, whereas in stable WCH the risk was increased also when data were adjusted for baseline confounders, including ambulatory BP (hazard ratio, 16; P=0.001 for cardiovascular death and 1.92; P=0.02 for all-cause death). At a multivariable analysis, office BP was among the factors independently predicting death, and results were superimposable with use of Monza population-derived and guidelines-derived cutoff values for ambulatory BP normality (125/79 and 130/80 mm Hg, respectively). Thus, only when office BP is persistently elevated does WCH reflect the existence of an abnormal long-term mortality risk. This means that in WCH office BP is prognostically relevant and that repeated collection of its values is clinically important to better define patient risk.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Hypertension I: Introduction
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:

