Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Impact of Individuals on Individuals01:30

Impact of Individuals on Individuals

488
Human behavior is intricately shaped by social influences that arise from interactions with others in diverse contexts. These influences not only mold beliefs and attitudes but also drive the regulation of behaviors through both direct communication and observational learning. The study of these processes falls within the domain of social psychology, which seeks to understand how individuals are affected by and affect those around them.Mechanisms of Social InfluenceDirect social influence...
488
The Stanford Prison Experiment03:20

The Stanford Prison Experiment

25.1K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
25.1K
Social Exchange Theory01:26

Social Exchange Theory

772
As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...
772
Social Exchange Theory02:06

Social Exchange Theory

40.9K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
40.9K
What is an Experiment?01:12

What is an Experiment?

19.8K
An experiment is a planned activity carried out under controlled conditions. The purpose of an experiment is to investigate the relationship between two variables. When one variable causes change in another, we call the first variable the explanatory or independent variable. The affected variable is called the response or dependent variable. In a randomized experiment, the researcher manipulates values of the explanatory variable and measures the resulting changes in the response variable. The...
19.8K
Defining Social Psychology01:09

Defining Social Psychology

699
Social psychology investigates how the presence and actions of others influence individual behavior, cognition, and emotion. Examining the social environment's impact provides a scientific framework for understanding how individuals perceive others and are, in turn, influenced by them. This field seeks to uncover the underlying principles guiding social interactions, exploring phenomena such as conformity, obedience, and prosocial behavior.Core Themes in Social PsychologyOne central focus of...
699

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Not Another Grocery List: Proposals for an Effective AI Ethics Implementation.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

From Biopiracy to Sustainable Knowledge Governance: Epistemic Justice and the Reconstruction of Resource Sovereignty in the Global South.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Deliberative Lab Communication and the Practice of Ethical Science.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Graduate Students Find Content of Responsible Conduct of Research Coursework Useful.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Discursive Ethics as a Normative Foundation for Integrating Ethics into AI Clinical Decision Support Systems.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Tragedies of Technology: An Exploration of Such Narratives.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 10, 2026

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
11:13

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

Published on: November 19, 2015

14.7K

Facing up to Complexity: Implications for Our Social Experiments.

Ronnie Hawkins1

  • 1Department of Philosophy, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, 32816-1352, USA. 2ronniehawkins@gmail.com.

Science and Engineering Ethics
|June 12, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Biological complexity creates uncertainty in technological interventions. The author proposes viewing new technologies as social experiments rather than relying solely on the precautionary principle.

Keywords:
Complexity theoryGenetically modified organisms (GMOs)Ibo van de PoelInsertional mutagenesisJohn SearleOntological subjectivityPrecautionary principlePrion disease (BSE, vCJD)ReductionismSocial cageSocial constructionSocial experimentSubstantially equivalentWhistleblowing

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.9K
Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

15.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 10, 2026

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
11:13

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

Published on: November 19, 2015

14.7K
Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.9K
Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

15.8K

Area of Science:

  • Biological Systems
  • Societal Impact of Technology

Background:

  • Biological systems exhibit high complexity, leading to uncertainty regarding interventions.
  • New technologies increasingly impact living systems and human bodies, creating large-scale "social experiments".

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss biological complexity and its connection to technologies like BSE/vCJD and GM foods.
  • To analyze social dynamics complexities related to technological adoption.
  • To advocate for a shift from the precautionary principle to a social experiment approach for evaluating new technologies.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of biological complexity.
  • Analysis of social dynamics.
  • Conceptual framework proposal.

Main Results:

  • Technological interventions in complex biological systems carry inherent uncertainties.
  • Societal reactions and controversies (e.g., BSE/vCJD, GM foods) highlight these complexities.
  • The precautionary principle may be insufficient for managing novel technological risks.

Conclusions:

  • Evaluating new technologies as social experiments offers a more pragmatic approach.
  • This framework acknowledges the inherent uncertainties and societal dimensions of technological introduction.
  • A shift in evaluation methodology is needed to better navigate the impact of emerging technologies.