Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Middle latency response: frequency and intensity effects.

D I Smith1, F S Lee, J H Mills

  • 1Dept. of Otolaryngology and Communicative Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425.

Hearing Research
|November 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Oxygen Sensing-From Bedside to Bench: A Family with Erythrocytosis Establishes a Role for Prolyl Hydroxylase Domain Protein 2 in Oxygen Homeostasis. Proc National Acad Sci U S A 103: 654-659, 2006.

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN·2023
Same author

Quantitative validation of immunofluorescence and lectin staining using reduced CLARITY acrylamide formulations.

Brain structure & function·2017
Same author

BDNF at the synapse: why location matters.

Molecular psychiatry·2017
Same author

Translational profiling of stress-induced neuroplasticity in the CA3 pyramidal neurons of BDNF Val66Met mice.

Molecular psychiatry·2016
Same author

Developmental regulation of fear learning and anxiety behavior by endocannabinoids.

Genes, brain, and behavior·2015
Same author

Altered expression of tumor suppressor PHF20 in myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Leukemia·2014
Same journal

TGF-β signaling regulates flat epithelium formation in severely injured adult mouse utricle through epithelial-mesenchymal transition.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Membrane scaffolding in auditory hair cells - a molecular tightrope walk enables lateral wall stiffness and flexibility.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Speech-in-noise recognition during hearing protector use: Human performance and acoustic prediction.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Estimation of hair cell loss from audiograms.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Cochlear size variation in a large-scale international multicentre cohort.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Estimation of minor-to-moderate conductive hearing loss with distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Hearing research·2026
See all related articles

Auditory middle latency responses (MLR) in gerbils show minimal latency changes with intensity and no significant changes with frequency. MLR amplitudes are variable and inversely related to stimulus frequency, suggesting it

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Otoacoustic Emissions

Background:

  • Auditory evoked potentials, including auditory middle latency responses (MLR) and auditory brainstem responses (ABR), are crucial for assessing auditory pathway function.
  • Understanding MLR characteristics in animal models aids in interpreting human auditory processing and disorders.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To characterize the auditory middle latency responses (MLR) in gerbils.
  • To analyze the effects of stimulus intensity and frequency on MLR parameters.
  • To compare gerbil MLRs with those of other species and assess MLR's utility in auditory function studies.

Main Methods:

  • Epidural electrodes were used to record MLRs and ABRs in unanesthetized gerbils.
  • Stimulus intensity (10-80 dB SPL) and frequency (0.5-16 kHz) were systematically varied.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Latencies and amplitudes of MLR peaks (waves A, B, C) were analyzed in relation to stimulus parameters.

    • Main Results:

    • MLR latencies showed minor changes with stimulus intensity, particularly for waves A and B at low intensities.
    • Latencies were not significantly affected by stimulus frequency.
    • MLR amplitudes were highly variable, showed complex intensity-dependent changes, and were generally inversely related to stimulus frequency.
    • MLR was less sensitive than ABR for hearing thresholds above 1 kHz but elicited across a wide frequency range.

    Conclusions:

    • Gerbil MLRs share similarities with those of other mammals (guinea pig, cat, rat) and show qualitative resemblances to human MLRs.
    • MLR, reflecting central auditory pathway activation, offers a potential electrophysiological tool for studying auditory function and pathology.
    • While less sensitive than ABR for high frequencies, MLR provides valuable insights into central auditory processing.