Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.

Framing Effects

Framing Effects

Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026

Same author

Conditioned features are selectively encoded into working memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026

Same author

Statistical learning and the efficiency of visual search.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026

Same author

Orienting bias towards electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) cues.

Addictive behaviors reports·2026

Same author

The Attention Habit II: How selection history shapes the strategic control of attention.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025

Same author

Statistical regularities bias memory decisions without enhancing working memory encoding: Insights from attribute amnesia.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025

Same journal

Colour blindness adversely impacts face recognition.

Visual cognition·2026

Same journal

Confidence in incomplete visual search.

Visual cognition·2026

Same journal

The Predictive Ability of GBVS Feature Channels on Infants' Fixations of Natural Scenes.

Visual cognition·2025

Same journal

Learned relevance of a distracting cue can influence feature interference errors.

Visual cognition·2025

Same journal

How Does Mind-Wandering Affect Distractor Suppression?

Visual cognition·2025

Same journal

Incidental Learning of Temporal and Spatial Associations in Hybrid Search.

Visual cognition·2025

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 10, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Value-Driven Attentional Capture is Modulated by Spatial Context.

Brian A Anderson¹

¹Johns Hopkins University.

Visual Cognition

|June 13, 2015

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Attentional capture by reward-associated features is location-dependent. Attention is prioritized for features linked to rewards only in specific spatial contexts, aiding efficient foraging.

Keywords:

contextual learning reward learning selective attention spatial attention

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 10, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Area of Science:

Cognitive psychology
Neuroscience
Behavioral science

Background:

Visual features of stimuli associated with rewards gain high attentional priority.
Reward prediction can vary based on contextual factors, such as spatial location.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate if attentional priority for reward-associated features is modulated by location-based contingencies.
To understand how reward learning influences attention in complex environments.

Main Methods:

Experimental manipulation of stimulus-reward associations across different spatial locations.
Measurement of attentional capture by specific features in cued versus uncued locations.

Main Results:

Attentional capture by a feature was observed only when it appeared in the spatial location previously associated with reward.
This location-specific attentional capture demonstrates a modulation of attention by learned reward contingencies.

Conclusions:

Reward learning dynamically modulates attentional priority based on spatial context.
This mechanism supports efficient foraging by guiding attention to relevant cues in specific environments.