Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.3K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.3K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

394
Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
394
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

384
Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
384
Blinding01:11

Blinding

4.1K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
4.1K
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

4.8K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
4.8K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

564
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
564

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Impact of Community Generated PPE During the SARS-COV-2 Pandemic in Southeast Alabama and Gulfport Mississippi.

Frontiers in health services·2023
Same author

Unequal allocation and allocation concealment.

Statistics in medicine·2012
Same author

Excess medicaid payments and the stock prices of drug companies.

Journal of managed care pharmacy : JMCP·2012
Same author

A model of patient choice with mid-therapy information.

The patient·2012
Same author

Sensitivity designs for preventing bias replication in randomized clinical trials.

Statistical methods in medical research·2010
Same author

Resource use and costs of treatment with anticoagulation and antiplatelet agents: results of the WATCH trial economic evaluation.

Journal of cardiac failure·2009

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 10, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.5K

Run-Reversal Equilibrium for Clinical Trial Randomization.

William C Grant1

  • 1Department of Economics, James Madison University, Harrisonburg VA, United States of America; Visiting Faculty, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham NC, United States of America.

Plos One
|June 17, 2015
PubMed
Summary

We introduce run-reversal equilibrium (RRE), a novel restricted randomization method for clinical trials. RRE enhances experimental validity by ensuring treatment balance while allowing site-specific random treatment sequences.

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.8K
A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

11.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 10, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.5K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.8K
A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

11.5K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Game Theory in Healthcare
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Clinical trial randomization is crucial for unbiased results.
  • Investigator treatment predictions can introduce bias in multi-site trials.
  • Existing methods may not fully mitigate prediction-based biases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a new restricted randomization method, run-reversal equilibrium (RRE).
  • To enhance scientific validity in multi-site clinical trials.
  • To counteract biases arising from investigators observing treatment histories.

Main Methods:

  • Described RRE as a Nash equilibrium of a game between statisticians and investigators.
  • Modeled RRE randomization to account for investigator treatment predictions.
  • Analyzed RRE's impact on treatment imbalance at site and overall levels.

Main Results:

  • RRE ensures treatment balance is tightly constrained and regularly restored overall.
  • Treatment imbalance follows a random walk at individual sites under RRE.
  • RRE randomization is imperfectly correlated with overall treatment imbalance at each site.

Conclusions:

  • RRE facilitates less predictable and more scientifically valid experiments.
  • This method improves upon traditional randomization in multi-site settings.
  • RRE offers a robust approach to managing treatment allocation in complex trials.