Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 10, 2026

06:18
Optimized Bone Sampling Protocols for the Retrieval of Ancient DNA from Archaeological Remains
Published on: November 30, 2021
5.4K
Improving access to endogenous DNA in ancient bones and teeth.
Peter B Damgaard1, Ashot Margaryan1, Hannes Schroeder2
1Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum, University of Copenhagen.
Scientific Reports
|June 18, 2015
Summary
Improving ancient DNA extraction is crucial for genomic research. A brief enzymatic pre-digestion of bone powder and targeting tooth roots significantly boosts endogenous DNA yield, enabling more ancient genome studies.
Area of Science:
- Paleogenomics
- Molecular Biology
- Archaeological Science
Background:
- Ancient DNA (aDNA) research is limited by poor DNA preservation in archaeological samples.
- Endogenous DNA is often a minor fraction of total DNA in extracts, hindering efficient sequencing.
- Shotgun sequencing of ancient samples is inefficient due to low endogenous DNA content.
Purpose of the Study:
- To improve the yield of endogenous DNA from ancient bones and teeth.
- To enhance the efficiency of ancient genomic research.
- To establish new standard protocols for aDNA extraction.
Main Methods:
- Enzymatic pre-digestion of powdered ancient bone samples using EDTA.
- Optimization of pre-digestion time (30 minutes to 6 hours).
- Targeted extraction of DNA from the outer layer of ancient tooth roots.
Main Results:
- A 2.7-fold average increase in endogenous DNA was observed after a 1-hour pre-digestion.
- Brief pre-digestion (15-30 minutes) improved DNA yield in 16 out of 21 samples.
- Targeting tooth roots yielded up to 14 times more endogenous DNA compared to inner dentine.
Conclusions:
- A brief enzymatic pre-digestion step should be implemented as a standard procedure in aDNA extraction.
- Targeting specific parts of teeth, like the outer roots, can maximize endogenous DNA recovery.
- These methods increase the number of ancient samples suitable for genome-scale characterization.
Related Concept Videos
DNA Isolation
47.0K
DNA isolation protocols can be fast and straightforward or complex and time-consuming depending on the type and quality of DNA required for further processing. For example, plasmid DNA extraction is a bit more complicated than genomic DNA extraction because of the need for an appropriate lysis method to separate plasmid DNA from gDNA during isolation. However, for specific applications, such as long-range DNA sequencing that require a good yield of high- quality DNA samples, we need to follow...
47.0K
DNA Isolation
203.5K
DNA from cells is required for many biotechnology and research applications, such as molecular cloning. To remove and purify DNA from cells, researchers use various methods of DNA extraction. While the specifics of different protocols may vary, some general concepts underlie the process of DNA extraction.
203.5K
Next-generation Sequencing
101.8K
The first human genome sequencing project cost $2.7 billion and was declared complete in 2003, after 15 years of international cooperation and collaboration between several research teams and funding agencies. Today, with the advent of next-generation sequencing technologies, the cost and time of sequencing a human genome have dropped over 100 fold.
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....
101.8K
Genomic DNA in Eukaryotes
54.3K
Eukaryotes have large genomes compared to prokaryotes. To fit their genomes into a cell, eukaryotic DNA is packaged extraordinarily tightly inside the nucleus. To achieve this, DNA is tightly wound around proteins called histones, which are packaged into nucleosomes that are joined by linker DNA and coil into chromatin fibers. Additional fibrous proteins further compact the chromatin, which is recognizable as chromosomes during certain phases of cell division.
54.3K

