Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 8, 2026

Pulse Wave Velocity Testing in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging
Published on: February 7, 2014
Modification over time of pulse wave velocity parallel to changes in aortic BP, as well as in 24-h ambulatory
A Oliveras1,2, J Segura3, C Suarez4
1Hypertension Unit, Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitari del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Insights
Changes in 24-hour systolic blood pressure (SBP) and aortic blood pressure (aoBP) more accurately reflect arterial stiffness changes than office BP measurements. This study highlights the importance of continuous BP monitoring for assessing cardiovascular risk.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Vascular Biology
- Hypertension Research
Background:
- Arterial stiffness, measured by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), is a key indicator of preclinical organ damage and cardiovascular risk.
- Limited data exist on the association between long-term variations in aortic blood pressure (aoBP) and cfPWV (ΔcfPWV).
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between long-term blood pressure (BP) variations and changes in arterial stiffness.
- To compare the predictive value of different BP measurement methods (office, 24-h ambulatory, and aortic) for changes in arterial stiffness.
Main Methods:
- Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) and aortic blood pressure (aoBP) were measured using applanation tonometry in 209 hypertensive patients with diabetes or metabolic syndrome at baseline and 12-month follow-up.
- Peripheral blood pressure was recorded using office (o-BP) and 24-h ambulatory (24-h BP) devices.
- Long-term variations (Δ) in BP and cfPWV were calculated and analyzed for correlations and independent associations.
Main Results:
- ΔcfPWV showed significant correlations with variations in office SBP (ΔoSBP), 24-h SBP (Δ24-h SBP), daytime SBP, nighttime SBP, and ΔaoSBP.
- Multiple linear regression revealed that Δ24-h SBP and ΔaoSBP were independently associated with ΔcfPWV.
- Changes in 24-h SBP and aoSBP provided a more accurate reflection of arterial stiffness changes compared to office BP measurements.
Conclusions:
- Long-term variations in 24-h SBP and aoSBP are more closely linked to changes in arterial stiffness than office BP measurements.
- These findings underscore the clinical utility of continuous BP monitoring for a comprehensive assessment of vascular health and cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients.
Abstract:
Arterial stiffness as assessed by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) is a marker of preclinical organ damage and a predictor of cardiovascular outcomes, independently of blood pressure (BP). However, limited evidence exists on the association between long-term variation (Δ) on aortic BP (aoBP) and ΔcfPWV. We aimed to evaluate the relationship of ΔBP with ΔcfPWV over time, as assessed by office and 24-h ambulatory peripheral BP, and aoBP. AoBP and cfPWV were evaluated in 209 hypertensive patients with either diabetes or metabolic syndrome by applanation tonometry (Sphygmocor) at baseline(b) and at 12 months of follow-up(fu). Peripheral BP was also determined by using validated oscillometric devices (office(o)-BP) and on an outpatient basis by using a validated (Spacelabs-90207) device (24-h ambulatory BP). ΔcfPWV over time was calculated as follows: ΔcfPWV=[(cfPWVfu-cfPWVb)/cfPWVb] × 100. ΔBP over time resulted from the same formula applied to BP values obtained with the three different measurement techniques. Correlations (Spearman 'Rho') between ΔBP and ΔcfPWV were calculated. Mean age was 62 years, 39% were female and 80% had type 2 diabetes. Baseline office brachial BP (mm Hg) was 143±20/82±12. Follow-up (12 months later) office brachial BP (mm Hg) was 136±20/79±12. ΔcfPWV correlated with ΔoSBP (Rho=0.212; P=0.002), Δ24-h SBP (Rho=0.254; P<0.001), Δdaytime SBP (Rho=0.232; P=0.001), Δnighttime SBP (Rho=0.320; P<0.001) and ΔaoSBP (Rho=0.320; P<0.001). A multiple linear regression analysis included the following independent variables: ΔoSBP, Δ24-h SBP, Δdaytime SBP, Δnighttime SBP and ΔaoSBP. ΔcfPWV was independently associated with Δ24-h SBP (β-coefficient=0.195; P=0.012) and ΔaoSBP (β-coefficient= 0.185; P=0.018). We conclude that changes in both 24-h SBP and aoSBP more accurately reflect changes in arterial stiffness than do office BP measurements.
Related Concept Videos
Sites for measuring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:

