Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Network dynamics underlying activity-timescale differences between cortical regions.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Stimulus Contingency and Task Context Encoding within the Anterior Cingulate-Amygdala-Cerebellum Associative Learning Network.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2025
Same author

Brain-wide dynamics linking sensation to action during decision-making.

Nature·2024
Same author

Disrupting dorsal hippocampus impairs category learning in rats.

Neurobiology of learning and memory·2024
Same author

Dynamic Changes in Local Activity and Network Interactions among the Anterior Cingulate, Amygdala, and Cerebellum during Associative Learning.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2023
Same author

Feedback inhibition underlies new computational functions of cerebellar interneurons.

eLife·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 8, 2026

Classical Short-Delay Eyeblink Conditioning in One-Year-Old Children
07:36

Classical Short-Delay Eyeblink Conditioning in One-Year-Old Children

Published on: September 1, 2018

41.0K

Links Between Single-Trial Changes and Learning Rate in Eyelid Conditioning.

Andrei Khilkevich1, Hunter E Halverson1, Jose Ernesto Canton-Josh1

  • 1Center for Learning and Memory, The University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station C7000, Austin, TX, 78712-0805, USA.

Cerebellum (London, England)
|June 27, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Single-trial learning effects in the cerebellum are confirmed in eyelid conditioning. Omission of climbing fiber input on stimulus-alone trials reduces conditioned response amplitude, demonstrating stochastic cerebellar learning.

Keywords:
Climbing fiberLTDLTPStochastic learningTiming

More Related Videos

Whisker-signaled Eyeblink Classical Conditioning in Head-fixed Mice
10:14

Whisker-signaled Eyeblink Classical Conditioning in Head-fixed Mice

Published on: March 30, 2016

13.5K
A Flexible Platform for Monitoring Cerebellum-Dependent Sensory Associative Learning
11:32

A Flexible Platform for Monitoring Cerebellum-Dependent Sensory Associative Learning

Published on: January 19, 2022

4.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 8, 2026

Classical Short-Delay Eyeblink Conditioning in One-Year-Old Children
07:36

Classical Short-Delay Eyeblink Conditioning in One-Year-Old Children

Published on: September 1, 2018

41.0K
Whisker-signaled Eyeblink Classical Conditioning in Head-fixed Mice
10:14

Whisker-signaled Eyeblink Classical Conditioning in Head-fixed Mice

Published on: March 30, 2016

13.5K
A Flexible Platform for Monitoring Cerebellum-Dependent Sensory Associative Learning
11:32

A Flexible Platform for Monitoring Cerebellum-Dependent Sensory Associative Learning

Published on: January 19, 2022

4.0K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cerebellar Learning
  • Synaptic Plasticity

Background:

  • Single-trial learning effects, driven by climbing fiber inputs, are a breakthrough in understanding cerebellar function.
  • These effects link climbing fiber-mediated plasticity to cerebellar learning, highlighting its stochastic nature.
  • Cerebellar learning involves incremental gain changes from individual movement instances.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To replicate and extend findings on single-trial learning effects using classical conditioning of eyelid responses.
  • To investigate the impact of omitted climbing fiber input on conditioned response amplitude and timing.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of a large dataset from classical eyelid conditioning experiments.
  • Examination of stimulus-alone trials (omitting climbing fiber input) and their effect on subsequent paired trials.
  • Measurement of conditioned response amplitude and timing following stimulus-alone trials.

Main Results:

  • A measurable decrease in conditioned response amplitude was observed after stimulus-alone trials (no climbing fiber input).
  • This single-trial effect on amplitude was more pronounced with longer interstimulus intervals.
  • The magnitude of the single-trial effect correlated with the rate of extinction across different interstimulus intervals.

Conclusions:

  • The study confirms single-trial learning effects in a distinct cerebellar learning paradigm (eyelid conditioning).
  • Results support the link between single-trial plasticity and the overall learning process in the cerebellum.
  • The findings underscore the stochastic, incremental nature of cerebellar-dependent learning.