Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 8, 2026

An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field
Published on: May 26, 2020
Within-Match PlayerLoad™ Patterns During a Simulated Soccer Match: Potential Implications for Unit Positioning and
Steve Barrett1, Adrian W Midgley, Christopher Towlson
1Dept of Sport, Health and Exercise Science, University of Hull, Kingston Upon Hull, UK.
PlayerLoad (PL) monitoring during soccer simulations is reliable, with the center of mass (COM) location detecting movement strategy changes for fatigue management. Scapulae (SCAP) placement requires cautious interpretation of lower-limb movement data.
Area of Science:
- Sports Science
- Biomechanics
- Human Movement Analysis
Background:
- Triaxial accelerometry, including PlayerLoad (PL), quantifies athlete load.
- Understanding PL variations across anatomical locations is crucial for accurate load monitoring.
- Standardized soccer match simulations (SAFT90) provide a controlled environment for such assessments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate acute changes in triaxial accelerometry (PlayerLoad [PL(VM)]) and its axial planes (PL(AP), PL(ML), PL(V)) during a 90-min soccer match simulation (SAFT90).
- To determine the test-retest reliability of these measures.
- To assess the influence of device anatomical location (scapulae [SCAP] vs. center of mass [COM]) on the data.
Main Methods:
- Semiprofessional and university soccer players (n=20) participated in 3 SAFT90 trials.
- PlayerLoad and its axial components were measured using micromechanical-electrical systems (MEMS).
- Devices were positioned at the scapulae (SCAP) and near the center of mass (COM).
Main Results:
- PlayerLoad (PL(VM)) showed no between-halves differences, but within-half increases occurred at the COM (1st half) and SCAP (1st half).
- Vertical (PL(V)) and mediolateral (PL(ML)) components contributed most to PL(VM) from SCAP and COM, respectively.
- Measures were significantly greater at the COM compared to the SCAP for PL(VM), PL(AP), PL(ML), and PL(V).
- High test-retest reliability (ICC .80-.99) was observed for all measures at both locations.
Conclusions:
- PlayerLoad and its axial planes are reliable during SAFT90.
- COM placement effectively detects within-match changes in movement strategy, aiding fatigue management.
- Data from SCAP placement should be interpreted cautiously when inferring lower-limb movement strategies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Motion of a Projectile
Horizontal motion, governed by the initial kick, maintains a constant velocity throughout the flight of the soccer ball.
Social Facilitation
Stress: General Loading Conditions
The shearing force, possessing potential directionality within the plane of the section, is simplified into two component forces running parallel to the x and y axes....
Deformation of Member under Multiple Loadings
In the case of a member with a variable cross-section, the strain is not constant but depends on the position. The deformation of an...
Distributed Loads
For example, consider a bookshelf filled with books stacked vertically adjacent to each other. The weight of the books is evenly distributed over the length of the shelf. As a result, the pressure at different locations on the surface of the...
Load along a Single Axis
Consider a beam of length L subjected to a varying load, which is a combination of parabolic and trapezoidal load distribution along the x-axis. In this case, it is essential to determine the resultant loads, their locations, and...

