Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 8, 2026

Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Whole Kidney, Medulla, and Cortical Tubules in Diabetic Pathogenesis of Kidney Injury in Mice
Published on: May 2, 2025
Characterization of renal biomarkers for use in clinical trials: effect of preanalytical processing and qualification
David A Brott1, Stephen T Furlong1, Scott H Adler1
1Enabling Safety Sciences, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Background:
Identifying the potential for drug-induced kidney injury is essential for the successful research and development of new drugs. Newer and more sensitive preclinical drug-induced kidney injury biomarkers are now qualified for use in rat toxicology studies, but biomarkers for clinical studies are still undergoing qualification. The current studies investigated biomarkers in healthy volunteer (HV) urine samples with and without the addition of stabilizer as well as in urine from patients with normoalbuminuric diabetes mellitus (P-DM).
Methods:
Urine samples from 20 male HV with stabilizer, 69 male HV without stabilizer, and 95 male DM without stabilizer (39 type 1 and 56 type 2) were analyzed for the following bio-markers using multiplex assays: α-1-microglobulin (A1M), β-2-microglobulin, calbindin, clusterin, connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), creatinine, cystatin-C, glutathione S-transferase α (GSTα), kidney injury marker-1 (KIM-1), microalbumin, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, osteopontin, Tamm-Horsfall urinary glycoprotein (THP), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1, trefoil factor 3 (TFF3), and vascular endothelial growth factor.
Results:
CTGF and GSTα assays on nonstabilized urine were deemed nonoptimal (>50% of values below assay lower limits of quantification). "Expected values" were determined for HV with stabilizer, HV without stabilizer, and P-DM without stabilizer. There was a statistically significant difference between HV with stabilizer compared to HV without stabilizer for A1M, CTGF, GSTα, and THP. DM urine samples differed from HV (without stabilizer) for A1M CTGF, GSTα, KIM-1, microalbumin, osteopontin, and TFF3. A1M also correctly identified HV and DM with an accuracy of 89.0%.
Summary:
These studies: 1) determined that nonstabilized urine can be used for assays under qualification; and 2) documented that A1M, CTGF, GSTα, KIM-1, microalbumin, osteopontin, and TFF3 were significantly increased in urine from P-DM. In addition, the 89.0% accuracy of A1M in distinguishing P-DM from HV may allow this biomarker to be used to monitor efficacy of potential renal protective agents.
Insights
New urine biomarkers show promise for detecting kidney injury in diabetes patients. Alpha-1-microglobulin (A1M) accurately distinguished between healthy volunteers and patients with diabetes mellitus, indicating potential for monitoring drug efficacy.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Clinical Chemistry
- Toxicology
Background:
- Drug-induced kidney injury (DIKI) identification is critical for new drug development.
- Preclinical DIKI biomarkers are qualified, but clinical biomarkers require further validation.
- This study evaluated urinary biomarkers in healthy volunteers and patients with diabetes mellitus.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the utility of various urinary biomarkers for detecting kidney injury.
- To assess biomarker performance in healthy volunteers (HV) with and without urine stabilizer.
- To evaluate biomarker levels in patients with normoalbuminuric diabetes mellitus (P-DM).
Main Methods:
- Analyzed urine samples from 20 HV with stabilizer, 69 HV without stabilizer, and 95 P-DM without stabilizer.
- Utilized multiplex assays to measure 16 biomarkers including α-1-microglobulin (A1M), connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), glutathione S-transferase α (GSTα), kidney injury marker-1 (KIM-1), and others.
- Determined "expected values" and compared biomarker levels between groups.
Main Results:
- CTGF and GSTα assays were suboptimal in non-stabilized urine.
- Significant differences in A1M, CTGF, GSTα, and THP were observed between HV with and without stabilizer.
- P-DM urine showed elevated levels of A1M, CTGF, GSTα, KIM-1, microalbumin, osteopontin, and TFF3 compared to HV.
- A1M demonstrated 89.0% accuracy in distinguishing P-DM from HV.
Conclusions:
- Non-stabilized urine is suitable for qualifying assays.
- A1M, CTGF, GSTα, KIM-1, microalbumin, osteopontin, and TFF3 are significantly increased in P-DM urine.
- A1M shows potential as a biomarker for monitoring renal protective agent efficacy in P-DM.
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting Renal Clearance: Renal Impairment
One condition associated with renal failure is uremia. Uremia is characterized by impaired glomerular filtration and fluid accumulation in the body. This condition hinders the renal clearance of drugs, resulting in drug accumulation and potential...
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Measurement of Glomerular Filtration Rate
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Serum Studies: Renal Function Tests
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine Concentration
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
