Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Bone Markings

Bone Markings

Bones have various surface features that help form joints and attach to other soft tissues. Depending on the function, bone markings are categorized into articulating projections, processes for attachment, depressions, and openings.
Articulating Projections
Articulating projections are found where two bones meet to form a joint. These structures are usually found at the ends of bones. The largest articulation is a rounded projection called the head, supported by a narrow neck at the ends of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Epidermis and Enamel: Insights Into Gnawing Criticisms of Human Bitemark Evidence.

The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology·2018

Same author

Dr. Golden responds.

Journal of the California Dental Association·2016

Same author

Commentary on: Page M, Taylor J, Blenkin M. Expert interpretation of bitemark injuries--a contemporary qualitative study. J Forensic Sci 2013;58(3):664-72.

Journal of forensic sciences·2013

Same author

The use of full spectrum digital photography for evidence collection and preservation in cases involving forensic odontology.

Forensic science international·2010

Same author

Lessons learned from the WTC disaster: a first-person account.

Journal of the California Dental Association·2004

Same author

Forensic odontology and elder abuse--a case study.

Journal of the California Dental Association·2004

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 8, 2026

The Tibial Fracture-Pin Model: A Clinically Relevant Mouse Model of Orthopedic Injury

The Tibial Fracture-Pin Model: A Clinically Relevant Mouse Model of Orthopedic Injury

Published on: July 28, 2022

Bite-Mark and Pattern Injury Analysis: A Brief Status Overview.

Gregory S Golden

Journal of the California Dental Association

|July 2, 2015

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Forensic bite-mark analysis relies on subjective interpretation, raising scientific validity questions. This review examines persistent issues and inherent subjectivity challenges in bite-mark evidence used in legal cases.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancing Traumatic Brain Injury Research - A Closed-Head Model for Accurate Replication and Rapid Assessment

Author Spotlight: Advancing Traumatic Brain Injury Research - A Closed-Head Model for Accurate Replication and Rapid Assessment

Published on: September 22, 2023

Automated Gait Analysis to Assess Functional Recovery in Rodents with Peripheral Nerve or Spinal Cord Contusion Injury

Automated Gait Analysis to Assess Functional Recovery in Rodents with Peripheral Nerve or Spinal Cord Contusion Injury

Published on: October 6, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 8, 2026

The Tibial Fracture-Pin Model: A Clinically Relevant Mouse Model of Orthopedic Injury

The Tibial Fracture-Pin Model: A Clinically Relevant Mouse Model of Orthopedic Injury

Published on: July 28, 2022

Author Spotlight: Advancing Traumatic Brain Injury Research - A Closed-Head Model for Accurate Replication and Rapid Assessment

Author Spotlight: Advancing Traumatic Brain Injury Research - A Closed-Head Model for Accurate Replication and Rapid Assessment

Published on: September 22, 2023

Automated Gait Analysis to Assess Functional Recovery in Rodents with Peripheral Nerve or Spinal Cord Contusion Injury

Automated Gait Analysis to Assess Functional Recovery in Rodents with Peripheral Nerve or Spinal Cord Contusion Injury

Published on: October 6, 2020

Area of Science:

Forensic Science
Pattern Evidence Analysis

Background:

Bite-mark analysis is a forensic discipline used to link unknown bite marks to a suspect.
Recent scientific scrutiny has questioned the reliability and validity of pattern evidence, including bite marks.
Concerns exist regarding the role of bite-mark analysis in judicial proceedings.

Purpose of the Study:

To discuss persistent issues within forensic science related to bite-mark analysis.
To highlight the inherent difficulties and subjectivity involved in bite-mark examination.
To address the scientific validity concerns surrounding bite-mark evidence.

Main Methods:

Literature review of scientific scrutiny and forensic challenges.
Discussion of subjective interpretation in pattern evidence analysis.
Examination of issues within forensic circles regarding bite-mark analysis.

Main Results:

Bite-mark analysis inherently involves subjective interpretation.
Questions persist regarding the scientific validity of bite-mark evidence.
Difficulties in bite-mark analysis stem from its reliance on human subjectivity.

Conclusions:

The scientific validity of bite-mark analysis remains a subject of debate.
Subjectivity is an inherent challenge in bite-mark interpretation.
Further examination of forensic methodologies is needed for bite-mark analysis.