Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 1, 2026

A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
Published on: April 19, 2019
A pharmacist-led follow-up program for patients with established coronary heart disease in North Norway - a
Beate H Garcia1, Trude Giverhaug2, June U Høgli3
1Hospital Pharmacy of North Norway; & Department of Pharmacy, University of Tromsø . Tromsø ( Norway ). beate.garcia@uit.no.
Insights
A clinical pharmacist-led follow-up program improved adherence to secondary prevention guidelines for coronary heart disease (CHD) patients. While biomedical risk factors did not significantly change, the program highlights the pharmacist
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Pharmacy
- Public Health
Background:
- Coronary heart disease (CHD) requires ongoing management and adherence to secondary prevention strategies.
- Clinical pharmacist interventions can play a role in improving patient outcomes and guideline adherence.
- A structured follow-up program may enhance the effectiveness of secondary prevention in CHD patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate a 12-month clinical pharmacist-led follow-up program for post-discharge CHD patients.
- To assess the program's impact on adherence to the medication assessment tool for secondary prevention of CHD (MAT-CHDSP).
- To explore changes in biomedical risk factors (cholesterol, blood pressure, blood glucose) following the intervention.
Main Methods:
- A non-blinded randomized controlled trial involving 102 patients with established CHD.
- Intervention group received pharmacist-led medication reconciliation, review, and education at discharge, 3, and 12 months.
- Control group received standard care; primary outcomes were adherence to MAT-CHDSP criteria, secondary outcomes were changes in risk factors.
Main Results:
- Overall adherence to MAT-CHDSP criteria increased in both groups, significantly higher in the intervention group (78.4% vs. 62.0%, p<0.001).
- Statistically significant improvements were observed for documented lifestyle advice in the intervention group.
- No significant improvements in biomedical risk factors (cholesterol, blood pressure, blood glucose) were found in favor of the intervention group.
Conclusions:
- Attention to clinical practice guideline recommendations, potentially a clinical pharmacist task, enhances adherence.
- A larger, adequately powered study is required to demonstrate significant differences in biomedical risk factor improvements.
- Program amendments are suggested before widespread implementation in standard patient care for CHD secondary prevention.
Objectives:
The aim of the study was twofold; 1) to develop a clinical pharmacist-led 12 month lasting follow-up program for patients with established coronary heart disease (CHD) discharged from the University Hospital of North Norway, and 2) to explore the impact of the program with regards to adherence to a medication assessment tool for secondary prevention of CHD and change in biomedical risk factors.
Methods:
A total of 102 patients aged 18-82 years were enrolled in a non-blinded randomized controlled trial with an intervention group and a control group. The intervention comprised medication reconciliation, medication review and patient education during three meetings; at discharge, after three months and after twelve months. The control group received standard care from their general practitioner. Primary outcomes were adherence to clinical guideline recommendations concerning prescription, therapy goal achievement and lifestyle education defined in the medication assessment tool for secondary prevention of CHD (MAT-CHDSP). Secondary outcomes included changes in the biomedical risk factors cholesterol, blood pressure and blood glucose.
Results:
Ninety-four patients completed the trial, 48 intervention group patients and 46 controls. Appropriate prescribing was high, but therapy goal achievement was low in both groups. Overall adherence to MAT-CHDSP criteria increased in both groups and was significantly higher in the intervention group at study end, 78.4% vs. 62.0%, p<0.001. The difference was statistically significant for the documented lifestyle advices in intervention group patients. No significant improvements in biomedical risk factors were observed in favor of the intervention group.
Conclusions:
The study showed an increased guideline adherence in both study groups. This indicates that attention to clinical practice guideline recommendations in itself increases adherence - which may be a clinical pharmacist task. A larger adequately powered study is needed to show a significant difference in biomedical risk factor improvements in favor of the intervention. Amendments to the follow-up program are suggested before implementation in standard patient care can be recommended.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Angina V: Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management