Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 7, 2026

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
Published on: June 30, 2020
Procedural learning: A developmental study of motor sequence learning and probabilistic classification learning in
Claire Mayor-Dubois1, Pascal Zesiger2, Martial Van der Linden2
1a Paediatric Neurology and Neurorehabilitation Unit , University Hospital , Lausanne , Switzerland.
This study explored motor and cognitive procedural learning in children aged 8-12. Results suggest distinct developmental paths for motor and cognitive learning, with strategy use improving with age.
Area of Science:
- Developmental psychology
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive science
Background:
- Procedural learning, encompassing motor and cognitive skills, is crucial for development.
- Previous research primarily focused on motor procedural learning, with limited data on cognitive procedural learning in children.
- Understanding the interplay between explicit and implicit knowledge in procedural learning is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate motor and cognitive procedural learning in typically developing children (8-12 years).
- To examine the role of declarative knowledge and strategy use in these learning processes.
- To explore potential correlations between motor and cognitive procedural learning performance.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the serial reaction time (SRT) task for motor learning and probabilistic classification learning (PCL) for cognitive learning.
- Assessed declarative knowledge and employed mathematical modeling to analyze strategy use in the PCL task.
- Compared performance across three age groups (8-9, 10-11, 12 years).
Main Results:
- Similar learning effects were observed in SRT and early PCL tasks across age groups, supporting age invariance.
- Declarative knowledge correlated with later PCL performance, indicating explicit knowledge involvement over time.
- Optimal strategy use in PCL increased with age, while no correlation was found between SRT and PCL performance.
Conclusions:
- The hypothesis of age invariance in procedural learning is extended to cognitive domains.
- Maturation of fronto-striatal pathways may support age-related improvements in learning strategies.
- Dissociable developmental trajectories exist within the procedural memory system, as evidenced by the lack of correlation between motor and initial cognitive learning.
Related Concept Videos
Associative Learning
Classical conditioning, also known...
Observational Learning
Steps in the Modeling Process
Attention is the first necessary component for observational learning. It involves focusing on what the model is doing and saying. For example, if you decide to take a drawing class to enhance your skills, you need to pay close attention to the instructor's words and hand movements. The characteristics of the model significantly...
Piaget's Stage 3 of Cognitive Development
Conservation and Constancy of Quantity
A significant cognitive milestone in the...
Language Development
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
Hierarchy of Motor Control

