Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 7, 2026

Resolving Water, Proteins, and Lipids from In Vivo Confocal Raman Spectra of Stratum Corneum through a Chemometric Approach
Published on: September 26, 2019
Reaching clinically relevant outcome measures for new pharmacotherapy and immunotherapy of atopic eczema
Joanne Chalmers1, Stefanie Deckert, Jochen Schmitt
1aCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK bCenter for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany *Eric L. Simpson, Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, USA; Phyllis I. Spuls, Department of Dermatology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Christian Apfelbacher, Medical Sociology, Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Bavaria, Germany; Kim S. Thomas, Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; Masutaka Furue, Department of Dermatology, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan; Hywel C. Williams, Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Purpose Of Review:
This article describes the core outcome set (COS) for atopic eczema trials.
Recent Findings:
COS describe a minimum set of outcomes to be assessed in a defined situation. COS are required to overcome the current situation of different trials using different endpoints with unclear/insufficient measurement properties resulting in incomparable trials. The global multi-stakeholder Harmonising Outcomes Measures for Eczema initiative developed the Harmonising Outcomes Measures for Eczema roadmap as a generic framework for COS development. Following the establishment of a panel representing all stakeholders, a core set of outcome domains need to be selected based on systematic reviews and consensus methods. Outcome measurement instruments to assess these core domains need to be valid, reliable, and feasible. There is broad global consensus that clinical signs, quality of life, symptoms, and long-term control of flares form the COS for atopic eczema trials. The Eczema Area and Severity Index is recommended to assess clinical signs in atopic eczema trials. Systematic reviews to identify adequate outcome measurement instruments for the other core outcome domains are underway.
Summary:
Clinical signs should be assessed in all atopic eczema trials by at least the Eczema Area and Severity Index. Quality of life, symptoms, and flares should also be assessed in all atopic eczema trials by a valid, reliable, and feasible instrument.
Insights
A core outcome set (COS) for atopic eczema trials standardizes outcome measures. This ensures comparability across studies by defining essential endpoints like clinical signs, quality of life, symptoms, and flares.
Area of Science:
- Dermatology
- Clinical Trials Methodology
- Patient-Reported Outcomes
Background:
- Inconsistent outcome measures in atopic eczema trials hinder comparability.
- A need exists for standardized core outcome sets (COS) to improve research synthesis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the established core outcome set (COS) for atopic eczema clinical trials.
- To outline the framework for developing and implementing COS in eczema research.
Main Methods:
- Development of a generic framework by the Harmonising Outcomes Measures for Eczema initiative.
- Selection of core outcome domains through systematic reviews and multi-stakeholder consensus.
- Evaluation of outcome measurement instruments for validity, reliability, and feasibility.
Main Results:
- Broad consensus identifies clinical signs, quality of life, symptoms, and flare control as core domains for atopic eczema COS.
- The Eczema Area and Severity Index is recommended for assessing clinical signs.
- Systematic reviews are ongoing to identify instruments for other core domains.
Conclusions:
- Clinical signs must be assessed using the Eczema Area and Severity Index in all atopic eczema trials.
- Quality of life, symptoms, and flares require assessment with valid, reliable, and feasible instruments.
Related Concept Videos
Clinically Relevant Drug Product Specifications: Methods of Establishment
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

