Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.5K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.9K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.9K
Motivational Bias01:25

Motivational Bias

481
Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
481
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

14.1K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
14.1K
The Representativeness Heuristic02:13

The Representativeness Heuristic

17.1K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
17.1K
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

12.7K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
12.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Understanding and challenging epistemically suspect beliefs: A call for expanding interdisciplinary research.

Journal of psychopathology and clinical science·2026
Same author

Subjective Well-Being Enhances Experiential Perceptions.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same author

Trajectories of Psychological Outcomes During the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same author

Imagining the future improves saving in preschoolers.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2024
Same author

Polarized imagination: partisanship influences the direction and consequences of counterfactual thinking.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2022
Same author

Feeling good without doing good: Comment on Orth and Robins (2022).

The American psychologist·2022
Same journal

On the Goals and Limitations of Psychological Science: Some Thoughts in Memory of Daniel Kahneman.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
Same journal

Imagine No Resources: Attention Is Selection and Normalization for Choice.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
Same journal

Children's Third-Party Punishment Reveals a Genuine Concern for Fairness and Justice.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
Same journal

Chaos Theory and Child Development: Quantifying Nonlinear Pathways of Growth.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
Same journal

Formal Modeling as Theoretical Glue Between Laboratory and Naturalistic Studies of Memory.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
Same journal

Growing Technological Opacity and the Social Brain.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 7, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.3K

Hindsight Bias.

Neal J Roese1, Kathleen D Vohs2

  • 1Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University n-roese@kellogg.northwestern.edu.

Perspectives on Psychological Science : a Journal of the Association for Psychological Science
|July 14, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Hindsight bias, the "knew it all along" effect, distorts memory and judgment. Understanding its cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational roots is key to mitigating overconfidence and improving decision-making.

Keywords:
counterfactualdebiashindsight biasmetacognitionoverconfidence“knew-it-all-along” effect

More Related Videos

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.3K
A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons Columba Livia
06:14

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons Columba Livia

Published on: September 7, 2018

6.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 7, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.3K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.3K
A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons Columba Livia
06:14

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons Columba Livia

Published on: September 7, 2018

6.8K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology

Background:

  • Hindsight bias describes the tendency to perceive past events as more predictable than they were before they occurred.
  • This phenomenon encompasses memory distortions, altered beliefs about event likelihoods, and misjudgments of personal predictive abilities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the multifaceted nature of hindsight bias.
  • To identify the cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational factors contributing to hindsight bias.
  • To examine the consequences of hindsight bias and potential interventions.

Main Methods:

  • The study synthesizes existing research on hindsight bias, analyzing its cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational underpinnings.
  • It reviews the impact of hindsight bias on judgment and decision-making.
  • It discusses the potential for new data visualization technologies to exacerbate hindsight bias.

Main Results:

  • Hindsight bias arises from cognitive processes (selective recall, sensemaking), metacognitive misattributions (ease of understanding), and motivational needs (order, predictability).
  • Consequences include narrow causal interpretations and overconfidence in judgments.
  • New data technologies may intensify this bias.

Conclusions:

  • Interventions encouraging consideration of alternative explanations can effectively reduce hindsight bias.
  • Mitigating hindsight bias is crucial for accurate judgment and decision-making, especially in data-rich environments.