Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 7, 2026

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
Published on: August 16, 2017
Carryover negligibility and relevance in bioequivalence studies
Jordi Ocaña1, Maria P Sanchez O2,3, Josep L Carrasco4
1Department of Statistics, Faculty of Biology, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Abstract:
The carryover effect is a recurring issue in the pharmaceutical field. It may strongly influence the final outcome of an average bioequivalence study. Testing a null hypothesis of zero carryover is useless: not rejecting it does not guarantee the non-existence of carryover, and rejecting it is not informative of the true degree of carryover and its influence on the validity of the final outcome of the bioequivalence study. We propose a more consistent approach: even if some carryover is present, is it enough to seriously distort the study conclusions or is it negligible? This is the central aim of this paper, which focuses on average bioequivalence studies based on 2 × 2 crossover designs and on the main problem associated with carryover: type I error inflation. We propose an equivalence testing approach to these questions and suggest reasonable negligibility or relevance limits for carryover. Finally, we illustrate this approach on some real datasets.
Insights
Carryover effects in pharmaceutical bioequivalence studies can distort results. This study proposes a new method to assess if carryover is negligible or significantly impacts study conclusions, ensuring reliable drug safety and efficacy findings.
Area of Science:
- Pharmaceutical Sciences
- Biostatistics
- Clinical Trial Design
Background:
- Carryover effects pose a significant challenge in pharmaceutical bioequivalence studies, potentially compromising the validity of study outcomes.
- Traditional null hypothesis testing for zero carryover is insufficient, failing to quantify the impact of existing carryover on study conclusions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a more robust approach for evaluating carryover effects in average bioequivalence studies using 2x2 crossover designs.
- To address the issue of type I error inflation caused by carryover and to determine if carryover is negligible or significantly distorts study conclusions.
Main Methods:
- An equivalence testing framework is proposed to assess the relevance of carryover effects.
- Development of methods to define and quantify negligibility or relevance limits for carryover.
Main Results:
- The proposed equivalence testing approach offers a more consistent evaluation of carryover impact compared to traditional methods.
- Demonstration of the practical application of the proposed method using real-world bioequivalence study datasets.
Conclusions:
- The new approach provides a clearer understanding of carryover effect significance in bioequivalence studies.
- This method aids in making more informed decisions about study validity and drug approval, ensuring patient safety and therapeutic efficacy.
More Related Videos
04:50Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research
Published on: August 4, 2023
04:53A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation
Bioequivalence: Overview
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers
Equivalence: In Vitro and In Vivo Bioequivalence
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs