Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 7, 2026

Visualizing Visual Adaptation
Published on: April 24, 2017
Testing the Controversy : An Empirical Examination of Adaptationists' Attitudes Toward Politics and Science
Joshua M Tybur1, Geoffrey F Miller2, Steven W Gangestad2
1Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Logan Hall B38E, MSC03 2220, Albuquerque, NM, 87131-1161, USA. tybur@unm.edu.
Abstract:
Critics of evolutionary psychology and sociobiology have advanced an adaptationists-as-right-wing-conspirators (ARC) hypothesis, suggesting that adaptationists use their research to support a right-wing political agenda. We report the first quantitative test of the ARC hypothesis based on an online survey of political and scientific attitudes among 168 US psychology Ph.D. students, 31 of whom self-identified as adaptationists and 137 others who identified with another non-adaptationist meta-theory. Results indicate that adaptationists are much less politically conservative than typical US citizens and no more politically conservative than non-adaptationist graduate students. Also, contrary to the "adaptationists-as-pseudo-scientists" stereotype, adaptationists endorse more rigorous, progressive, quantitative scientific methods in the study of human behavior than non-adaptationists.
More Related Videos
08:25Impedance Pneumography for Minimally Invasive Measurement of Heart Rate in Late Stage Invertebrates
Published on: April 4, 2020
06:42Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Natural Selection and Adaptation
Beyond physical adaptations,...
Functionalism
James envisioned psychology's...
Evolutionary Psychology
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Attitudes
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology