Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Acupoint Needle-Embedding Combined with Ironing Therapy for Postoperative Pain After Anal Surgery
Published on: June 23, 2023
Procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids vs traditional surgery for outlet obstructive constipation
1Ming Lu, Bo Yang, Yang Liu, Qing Liu, Hao Wen, Department of General Surgery, First Affiliated Teaching Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830054, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.
The procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) offers superior short-term and long-term outcomes compared to conventional surgery for constipation caused by rectal prolapse and hemorrhoids. PPH surgery resulted in shorter operative times and reduced long-term anal incontinence.
Area of Science:
- Colorectal Surgery
- Gastroenterology
- Surgical Innovation
Background:
- Outlet obstruction-induced constipation is often associated with internal rectal prolapse and circumferential hemorrhoids.
- Surgical intervention is frequently required to address these complex conditions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical efficacy of the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) against conventional surgery for patients with rectal prolapse and hemorrhoids causing outlet obstruction-induced constipation.
- To evaluate both short-term and long-term outcomes of each surgical approach.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study involving 108 inpatients with rectal prolapse hemorrhoids and outlet obstruction-induced constipation.
- Patients were randomly assigned to either the PPH group (n=54) or a conventional surgery control group (n=54).
- Clinical effects, including operative time, hospital stay, postoperative complications (urinary retention, edema, pain, stenosis, incontinence), and long-term functional outcomes (recurrence, defecation difficulty), were compared.
Main Results:
- The PPH group demonstrated significantly shorter operative times (24.36 min vs 44.27 min) and hospital stays (2.1 d vs 3.6 d) compared to the control group (P < 0.01).
- PPH surgery resulted in significantly lower incidences of perianal edema (11.11% vs 42.60%, P < 0.05) and sensory anal incontinence (3.70% vs 12.96%, P < 0.05).
- Pain scores were significantly lower in the PPH group at 24 hours, first defecation, and one week post-surgery (P < 0.01).
Conclusions:
- The procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) is clinically superior to traditional surgery for managing outlet obstructive constipation stemming from internal rectal prolapse with circumferential hemorrhoids.
- PPH offers advantages in terms of reduced operative time, shorter hospital stay, and lower rates of postoperative perianal edema and sensory anal incontinence.
More Related Videos
05:58Surgical Trunk Oriented Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy (ST-LRH) for Right-Sided Colon Cancer
Published on: July 25, 2025
08:26Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
Published on: March 24, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Drugs for Treatment of Constipation-Predominant IBS
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Drugs for Treatment of Diarrhea-Predominant IBS
Two specific drugs used in the treatment are alosetron (Lotronex) and eluxadoline (Viberzi). Alosetron, a 5-HT3 antagonist, works by slowing the movement of stools in the gut, reducing bowel...
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care