Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Optimal Foraging00:48

Optimal Foraging

14.2K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
14.2K
Instinctive Drift01:05

Instinctive Drift

1.3K
Instinctive drift refers to the tendency of animals to revert to their innate behaviors despite repeated reinforcement. Breland and Breland demonstrated this concept in an experiment with a raccoon. The raccoon was trained to pick up two coins and place them in a container in exchange for food. Initially, the raccoon learned to associate the coins with food, making them a conditioned stimulus or a substitute for food. However, over time, the raccoon became less willing to put the coins into the...
1.3K
Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

708
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
708
What is Behavior?00:54

What is Behavior?

10.5K
Behaviors are actions that an organism engages in—they can be related to finding food, reproducing, defending against threats, and many other possible actions. Behaviors include activities related to the environment around the animal—such as migration—as well as social interactions within a species or population. Many behaviors involve motor output—that is, muscle movements—while others involve less visible actions, such as learning.
10.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sex Differences in Scalp-to-Cortex Distance: Implications for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Efficacy in Alcohol Use Disorder.

Alcohol, clinical & experimental research·2026
Same author

Age and early life adversity shape heterogeneity of the epigenome across tissues in macaques.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

A Preliminary Study of Smoking Abstinence Effects on Acquisition and Reversal Learning in a Probabilistic Learning Task.

Substance use & misuse·2026
Same author

Selective Encoding of Priors for Flexible Categorization But Not Bayesian Inference in the Frontal Eye Field.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same author

Selective encoding of priors for flexible categorization but not Bayesian inference in the frontal eye field.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Mid-superior temporal sulcus encodes spatial context and behavioral state in freely moving macaques.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 6, 2026

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

8.0K

Suboptimal foraging behavior: a new perspective on gambling.

Merideth A Addicott1, John M Pearson2, Nicole Kaiser1

  • 1Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.

Behavioral Neuroscience
|July 21, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Gambling may stem from flawed natural foraging behaviors applied to finances, not just impulsivity. Frequent gamblers show poorer reward-maximizing abilities due to these dysfunctional financial foraging patterns.

More Related Videos

Foraging Path-length Protocol for Drosophila melanogaster Larvae
07:26

Foraging Path-length Protocol for Drosophila melanogaster Larvae

Published on: April 23, 2016

10.0K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 6, 2026

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

8.0K
Foraging Path-length Protocol for Drosophila melanogaster Larvae
07:26

Foraging Path-length Protocol for Drosophila melanogaster Larvae

Published on: April 23, 2016

10.0K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.3K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Conventional theories link gambling to irrational beliefs, impulsivity, or reward system dysfunction.
  • An alternative perspective suggests gambling extends natural foraging behaviors into financial contexts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between gambling frequency, irrational beliefs, risk-taking/impulsivity, and foraging behavior.
  • To explore if gambling reflects a maladaptive application of foraging strategies to financial decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Participants were grouped by annual, monthly, or weekly gambling frequency.
  • Evaluated irrational beliefs, risk-taking/impulsivity, and performance on foraging tasks (explore/exploit and Patchy Foraging Task).

Main Results:

  • Increased gambling frequency correlated with stronger gambling-related beliefs and more exploratory choices.
  • Frequent gamblers earned fewer points on the Patchy Foraging Task, indicating premature patch departure.
  • Gambling-related beliefs negatively impacted foraging task performance.
  • Gambling frequency and impaired foraging ability were not linked to risk-taking or impulsivity.

Conclusions:

  • Frequent gambling appears to result from a dysfunctional foraging process applied to financial outcomes.
  • This suggests that gambling behavior is not primarily driven by impulsivity or risk-seeking but by maladaptive foraging strategies.
  • Findings challenge traditional views by highlighting the role of foraging deficits in problem gambling.