Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 6, 2026

07:58
Automatic Laser-based Geometry Capture for Finite Element Analysis of Weld Beads
Published on: July 25, 2025
1.1K
Precision and accuracy testing of FMCW ladar-based length metrology
Applied Optics
|July 21, 2015
Summary
High-resolution frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) ladar systems for length metrology were calibrated using molecular spectroscopy. This method achieved a few parts per million (ppm) uncertainty, validated by interferometer comparisons.
Area of Science:
- Metrology
- Optical Engineering
- Spectroscopy
Background:
- Accurate calibration and traceability of frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) ladar sources are crucial for precision length and volume measurements.
- Existing calibration methods may not provide the required uncertainty for advanced metrology applications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish a robust calibration method for FMCW ladar length measurement systems.
- To achieve and validate high-accuracy measurements in the parts per million (ppm) uncertainty range.
Main Methods:
- Utilized molecular spectroscopy of hydrogen cyanide (HCN) in the C-band and carbon monoxide (CO) in the L-band as frequency references.
- Calibrated the chirp rate of FMCW ladar sources using these molecular spectral lines.
- Developed a displacement measurement interferometer for comparative analysis.
Main Results:
- Achieved an estimated uncertainty of a few ppm for the FMCW ladar system by propagating uncertainties from molecular calibrations and measurement errors.
- Interferometer comparisons demonstrated agreement within <10 ppm with the calibrated FMCW system.
- The observed agreement was consistent with the combined estimated uncertainties of both measurement systems.
Conclusions:
- Molecular spectroscopy provides an effective method for calibrating FMCW ladar systems for high-accuracy metrology.
- The developed calibration technique meets the stringent uncertainty requirements for length and volume measurements.
- This approach enhances the traceability and reliability of FMCW ladar in precision engineering applications.
Related Concept Videos
Accuracy and Precision
17.7K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. Highly accurate...
17.7K
Accuracy and Precision
3.1K
3.1K
Electronic Distance Measuring Instruments
685
Electronic Distance Measuring Instruments (EDMs) are essential tools in modern surveying, offering precise distance measurements by emitting electromagnetic signals and calculating the time required for these signals to travel to a target and return. Two primary types of signals are used in EDMs — light waves and microwaves — each suited to specific environmental and distance requirements. Light-wave-based EDMs utilize either infrared or laser light, providing high accuracy over...
685
Distance Corrections
385
To achieve precise distance measurements, especially in surveying and construction, certain corrections must be applied to account for potential sources of error like the standardization errors, temperature variations, and slope adjustments.Standardization error emerges when measurement equipment undergoes changes, such as wear, repairs, or weather impacts. To address this, surveyors compare the equipment’s readings to a standard. This process identifies any deviation that might lead to...
385
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors
614
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
614

