Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 6, 2026
09:07
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
Published on: September 16, 2015
9.5K
The role of future unpredictability in human risk-taking
E M Hill1,2, L T Ross3, B S Low3
1Department of Psychology, The University of Detroit Mercy, 8200 West Outer Drive, 48219, Detroit, MI. hillem@udmercy.edu.
Human Nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.)
|July 22, 2015
Summary
Life history theory enhances risk-taking models by incorporating environmental unpredictability and life expectancy. Higher perceived unpredictability and shorter estimated lifespans correlate with increased risk-taking behavior.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Evolutionary Biology
- Sociology
Background:
- Traditional social science models of risk-taking lack comprehensive theoretical frameworks.
- Life history theory offers insights into adaptive behaviors shaped by environmental factors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the utility of life history theory concepts in understanding human risk-taking.
- To examine the relationship between perceived environmental unpredictability, life expectancy, and risk-taking frequency.
Main Methods:
- Community college students completed self-report questionnaires.
- Measures included perceived future unpredictability, estimated lifespan, and risk-taking frequency.
- A novel Future Lifespan Assessment tool was utilized.
Main Results:
- Risk-taking frequency was positively associated with beliefs in future unpredictability.
- Shorter estimated lifespans were linked to higher risk-taking.
- Perceived unpredictability remained a significant predictor of risk-taking, even when controlling for sex and temperament.
Conclusions:
- Life history theory provides a valuable framework for enhancing models of human risk-taking.
- Perceptions of environmental uncertainty and future lifespan significantly influence behavioral choices.
- Future research should further explore these evolutionary-based concepts in diverse populations.
Related Concept Videos
01:19Counterfactual Thinking
398
Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in...
398
01:30Unrealistic Optimism Bias
321
Unrealistic optimism bias is the tendency to overestimate the likelihood of positive outcomes. This cognitive bias makes individuals believe they are less likely to experience failures, setbacks, or risks and more likely to succeed than others. For example, people may assume they are less prone to health issues, accidents, or financial struggles than their peers, even when they share similar risk factors.One key component of this bias is the above-average effect, where individuals perceive...
321
00:59Uncertainty: Overview
1.9K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.9K
01:19Personal Choice and Fate Attributions
236
Some individuals interpret life events as a consequence of their personal choices and actions, while others believe that outcomes are dictated by fate or destiny. This divergence in perspective has been examined in psychological and cross-cultural studies, particularly in relation to religious faith and cultural beliefs about causality.Fate and Personal ResponsibilityPeople who emphasize personal responsibility view events as direct consequences of their decisions. For instance, breaking a leg...
236
01:12Hindsight Biases
4.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
4.5K
01:37Reason and Intuition
7.7K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.7K