Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
Comparing time and risk preferences across three post-industrial UK cities
Marjon van der Pol1, David Walsh2, Gerry McCartney3
1Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Geographic location influences time and risk preferences, with Glasgow residents showing lower time preference but higher risk-seeking behavior. These opposing factors likely do not explain Glasgow's excess mortality.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Economics
- Public Health
- Health Economics
Background:
- Individual differences in time and risk preferences are significant but their determinants are not fully understood.
- Geographical variations in these preferences, particularly in relation to health outcomes, remain under-explored.
- The 'Glasgow effect,' referring to higher mortality in Glasgow beyond socioeconomic factors, necessitates investigation into potential contributing factors like behavioral preferences.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether geographical location influences individual time and risk preferences.
- To explore the potential role of these preferences in understanding geographical health disparities, specifically the 'Glasgow effect'.
Main Methods:
- Survey data collected from 3702 individuals across Glasgow, Manchester, and Liverpool between July and November 2011.
- Analysis of time preference rates and risk-seeking behaviors across the three geographical locations.
- Statistical comparison of preference heterogeneity between the cities.
Main Results:
- Evidence of significant geographical heterogeneity in time and risk preferences was found.
- Contrary to the hypothesis, individuals in Glasgow exhibited a lower time preference rate compared to other locations.
- Glasgow residents were more risk-seeking than those in Liverpool and more likely to be extremely risk-seeking than those in Manchester.
Conclusions:
- Geographical location is a determinant of individual time and risk preferences.
- Observed differences in risk-seeking and time preferences in Glasgow do not appear to explain the excess mortality, as they work in opposing directions regarding health investments.
- While risk preferences in Glasgow might suggest higher engagement in risky health behaviors, their future orientation suggests otherwise, complicating direct links to mortality rates.
Related Concept Videos
Relative Risk
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Cross-Sectional Research
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Framing Effects
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...

