Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
Effect of Cements at Different Temperatures on the Clinical Performance and Marginal Adaptation of Inlay-Onlay
Şeyda Aygün Emiroğlu1, Buket Evren1, Yasemin Kulak Özkan1
1Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Marmara, Istanbul, Turkey.
Purpose:
To evaluate the clinical performance of inlays and onlays luted with two different resin cements, mixed at different temperatures and to evaluate the marginal adaptation of the restorations.
Materials And Methods:
One hundred IPS e.max restorations (82 onlays, 18 inlays; 84 molars, 16 premolars) were placed in 50 patients (28 females, 22 males, mean age, 33 years). The restorations were assigned to six groups according to the luting agent temperature (25°C, 37°C, and 54°C) and cement type (Variolink N high viscosity or G-Cem Automix). All restorations were evaluated after 1 week and 1 year by two examiners using modified USPHS criteria. Replicas of 30 selected onlay restorations (5 per group) were assessed for marginal quality under a scanning electron microscope (SEM) at 200×. Marginal adaptation was quantitatively evaluated in terms of percentage of gap formation, and marginal gap width was measured.
Results:
After 1 year, the total survival rates of the Variolink N high viscosity group and G-Cem Automix group were 100% and 93.8%, respectively. Three debondings occurred with the G-Cem Automix group, one from each temperature group. For 1-year clinical service time, no significant difference was noticed in the marginal adaptation of Variolink N high viscosity groups and the 37°C G-Cem Automix group, while 25°C and 54°C G-Cem Automix groups' marginal adaptation scores decreased (p < 0.05). Regarding the SEM evaluations, Variolink N high viscosity cement groups showed better marginal adaptation than G-Cem Automix cement groups (p < 0.05). Cementation with the cements preheated to 37°C increased continuous margins in both enamel-cement and cement-ceramic interfaces, but these results were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Cements at different temperatures did not have significant effects on marginal gap widths of the restorations.
Conclusions:
The restorations cemented with Variolink N high viscosity cement mixed at the three tested temperatures exhibited better treatment options than the self-adhesive groups. Preheating the self-adhesive cement (G-Cem Automix) to 37°C can be an effective method to have better marginal adaptation than the other self-adhesive groups (25°C, 54°C) tested in this study.
More Related Videos
03:37Evaluating the Effects of Different Polishing Methods on Color Stability of Dental Restorations in Pediatric Dentistry
Published on: June 6, 2025
07:04Confocal Time Lapse Imaging as an Efficient Method for the Cytocompatibility Evaluation of Dental Composites
Published on: November 9, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Setting Time of Cement
Types of Cement I
Type I (Ordinary Portland Cement) is widely used for general construction where special properties are not required. It has moderate sulfate resistance and heat of hydration.
Type II (Modified Cement) offers moderate resistance to sulfate attack and a lower rate of heat development compared to Type I. It is suitable for structures in...
Soundness of Cement
Strength and Heat of Hydration
The heat of hydration for each cement compound is significant; for instance, tricalcium aluminate (C3A) and...
Hot Weather Concreting
Mitigating the heat increase in concrete can be economically achieved by shading aggregate stockpiles to prevent heating from solar radiation,...
Accelerated Curing of Concrete