Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Children's peer culture and the « selection for proliferation » hypothesis.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

A WEb-Accessible comprehensiVE platform for automatic vestibular schwannoma segmentation and longitudinal volumetric tracking.

Neuro-oncology advances·2026
Same author

The association between sepsis and diagnostic errors: A secondary analysis of the Utility of Predictive Systems for Diagnostic Error study.

Journal of hospital medicine·2026
Same author

BPI26-015: Complementing NCCN Guidelines With a Clinician-Guided AI Reasoning Platform: Evaluation of The BlueScrubs.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN·2026
Same author

BPI26-015: Complementing NCCN Guidelines With a Clinician-Guided AI Reasoning Platform: Evaluation of The BlueScrubs.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN·2026
Same author

Who knows what? Bayesian competence inference guides knowledge attribution and information search.

Cognition·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 6, 2026

In Depth Analyses of LEDs by a Combination of X-ray Computed Tomography CT and Light Microscopy LM Correlated with Scanning Electron Microscopy SEM
10:42

In Depth Analyses of LEDs by a Combination of X-ray Computed Tomography CT and Light Microscopy LM Correlated with Scanning Electron Microscopy SEM

Published on: June 16, 2016

9.9K

Use of TrueBeam developer mode for imaging QA.

Gilmer Valdes1, Olivier Morin, Yanisley Valenciaga

  • 1University of California. gilmer.valdes@uphs.upenn.edu.

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
|July 29, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study automated imaging quality assurance (QA) for radiation therapy, significantly reducing time for daily and monthly tests. Machine learning algorithms were used to analyze data, improving accuracy and efficiency in radiation therapy QA.

More Related Videos

Simultaneous Multicolor Imaging of Biological Structures with Fluorescence Photoactivation Localization Microscopy
12:51

Simultaneous Multicolor Imaging of Biological Structures with Fluorescence Photoactivation Localization Microscopy

Published on: December 9, 2013

9.5K
Near Infrared Optical Projection Tomography for Assessments of β-cell Mass Distribution in Diabetes Research
15:18

Near Infrared Optical Projection Tomography for Assessments of β-cell Mass Distribution in Diabetes Research

Published on: January 12, 2013

17.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 6, 2026

In Depth Analyses of LEDs by a Combination of X-ray Computed Tomography CT and Light Microscopy LM Correlated with Scanning Electron Microscopy SEM
10:42

In Depth Analyses of LEDs by a Combination of X-ray Computed Tomography CT and Light Microscopy LM Correlated with Scanning Electron Microscopy SEM

Published on: June 16, 2016

9.9K
Simultaneous Multicolor Imaging of Biological Structures with Fluorescence Photoactivation Localization Microscopy
12:51

Simultaneous Multicolor Imaging of Biological Structures with Fluorescence Photoactivation Localization Microscopy

Published on: December 9, 2013

9.5K
Near Infrared Optical Projection Tomography for Assessments of β-cell Mass Distribution in Diabetes Research
15:18

Near Infrared Optical Projection Tomography for Assessments of β-cell Mass Distribution in Diabetes Research

Published on: January 12, 2013

17.0K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiotherapy Technology
  • Machine Learning Applications

Background:

  • Modern linear accelerators enhance image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) accuracy but exponentially increase quality assurance (QA) test complexity.
  • Current imaging QA procedures for Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) are time-consuming and can be subjective.
  • There is a need for efficient and accurate automated QA methods to manage the increasing demands of advanced radiotherapy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate an automated paradigm for regular imaging QA procedures in SRS and SBRT protocols.
  • To improve the efficiency and accuracy of daily and monthly imaging QA tests on a Varian linac.
  • To implement machine learning for objective data analysis in the QA process.

Main Methods:

  • A three-step automated paradigm: data acquisition, processing, and analysis.
  • Developed XML scripts for automated data acquisition on a TrueBeam linac and MATLAB R2013B for data processing and analysis.
  • Utilized support vector machine (SVM) algorithms with texture metrics for artifact identification (beam hardening, rings, scatter) in 14 KV CBCT images of the Emma phantom.

Main Results:

  • Automated daily imaging QA reduced time from 14.3 ± 2.4 min to 4.2 ± 0.7 min.
  • Automated monthly imaging QA reduced time from 70.7 ± 8.0 min to 21.8 ± 0.6 min.
  • SVM algorithms correctly identified common image artifacts, removing subjectivity from data interpretation.

Conclusions:

  • The developed automated paradigm significantly enhances the efficiency and accuracy of imaging QA for SRS and SBRT.
  • Machine learning algorithms provide objective and reliable analysis of imaging QA data, improving interpretation.
  • This automation allows for the implementation of comprehensive QA programs, including best practices, without increasing manpower.