Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:

SBAR II: Application of SBAR

SBAR II: Application of SBAR

SBAR is an effective communication tool used by healthcare professionals to communicate patient information accurately. SBAR stands for Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation. For a better understanding, an example is given below.
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...

Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System

Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System

Health Information Technology (HIT)
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:

Methods of Documentation VII: EMR

Methods of Documentation VII: EMR

Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) primarily center around electronically documenting patients' health information within a single healthcare organization or practice. They contain essential clinical data related to a patient's medical history, diagnoses, medications, treatment plans, lab results, and other pertinent information relevant to the specific encounter or episode of care. EMRs are designed to streamline documentation and workflow processes within individual healthcare...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

TaILOR: a randomised trial to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU) strategy compared to standard care pathways in people with inflammatory arthritis: a study protocol.

Trials·2026

Same author

Stereotactic radiotherapy for neovascular age related macular degeneration: year 3 and 4 extended follow up results of a randomised, double masked, sham controlled, device trial (STAR).

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026

Same author

Patellar resurfacing in total knee replacement: 20-year clinical and economic results of a large multicentre, randomised controlled trial in the UK.

Lancet (London, England)·2026

Same author

Screening-to-intervention pathway for child anxiety problems alongside usual school practice versus usual school practice only (iCATSi2i): a cluster-randomised, controlled trial in primary schools in England.

The lancet. Psychiatry·2026

Same author

A United Kingdom Value Set for the EQ-5D-5L.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2026

Same author

Long-term Safety and Performance of an Implantable IVC Sensor for Congestion-Guided Management in Heart Failure: 12-Month Results from the FUTURE-HF Trial Portfolio.

European journal of heart failure·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

PREFERRED REPORTING ITEMS FOR STUDIES MAPPING ONTO PREFERENCE-BASED OUTCOME MEASURES: THE MAPS STATEMENT.

Stavros Petrou¹, Oliver Rivero-Arias², Helen Dakin³

¹Warwick Clinical Trials Unit,Warwick Medical School,University of Warwicks.petrou@warwick.ac.uk.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

|August 4, 2015

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

A new checklist called the MApping onto Preference-based measures reporting Standards (MAPS) statement has been developed to improve the reporting of mapping studies used in health economic evaluations.

Keywords:

Mapping Outcome Measures Preferences Reporting

More Related Videos

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

Area of Science:

Health Economics
Outcome Measurement
Health Technology Assessment

Background:

Mapping onto preference-based outcome measures is common in health economic evaluations.
Existing technical guides do not cover reporting standards for mapping studies.
A need exists for standardized reporting to ensure clarity and transparency.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop a reporting guideline for mapping studies.
To promote complete and transparent reporting of health economic evaluations using mapping.

Main Methods:

A de novo list of reporting items was created by a working group.
A modified Delphi survey involving diverse stakeholders was conducted.
The survey identified essential reporting items through consensus.

Main Results:

Twenty-three essential reporting items were developed from an initial list of twenty-nine.
These items are categorized into six sections: title/abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and other.
The MAPS statement is intended for use with its explanation and elaboration document.

Conclusions:

The MAPS statement is expected to enhance the clarity, transparency, and completeness of mapping study reports.
Co-publication across multiple journals aims to facilitate dissemination and uptake.
The working group will reassess the need for updates in five years.