Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Intracoronary Acetylcholine Provocation Testing for Assessment of Coronary Vasomotor Disorders
Published on: August 18, 2016
Allergic Inflammation Is Associated With Coronary Instability and a Worse Clinical Outcome After Acute Myocardial
Giampaolo Niccoli1, Camilla Calvieri2, Davide Flego2
1From the Department of Cardiology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy (G.N., G.S., G.L., F.C.); Department of Cardiovascular, Respiratory, Nephrology, Anesthesiology and Geriatric Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy (C.C.); Institute of Allergology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy (D.F., D.S.); Department of Epidemiology of Chronic Non-Communicable Diseases, Federal State Institution National Research Center for Preventive Medicine, Moscow, Russia (A.I.); and Department of Immunology-Allergology-Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of Antwerp, Belgium (V.S.). gniccoli73@hotmail.it.
Background:
The role of allergic inflammation in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) has not been clearly defined to date. Aim of this study was to assess eosinophil and basophil activation in ACS and the prognostic role of eosinophil cationic protein in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction.
Methods And Results:
In a cross-sectional study, we prospectively enrolled 51 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (60.8% patients with ACS and 39.2% with stable angina). Flow cytometry analysis assessed CD66b, CD69, and CD203c median fluorescence intensity expression. In a follow-up study, 181 patients presenting with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, were prospectively enrolled with a follow-up of 24 months. Eosinophil activation (CD66b) was similar in patients with ACS and stable angina (6.61 [4.91-7.72] versus 6.62 [5.27-8.73], P=0.63), whereas eosinophil degranulation (CD69) and basophil activation (CD203c) were higher in ACS patients compared with stable angina patients (1.38 [1.16-1.52] versus 1.17 [1-1.31], P=0.01); 0.97 [0.89-1.11] versus 0.92 [0.87-0.95], P=0.03, respectively). Eosinophil cationic protein serum levels were significantly higher in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients with major adverse cardiac events as compared with those without (21.1 [10.37-25.65] versus 7.83 [3.37-12.8] μg/L, P=0.01) and in patients with thrombus score >3 compared with those with thrombus score ≤3 (15.0 [9.8-24.7] versus 5.2 [3.5-22.9] μg/L, P=0.006). Eosinophil cationic protein serum levels predicted major adverse cardiac events during follow-up (odds ratio =1.041, 95% confidence interval 1.012-1.071, P=0.005). C-reactive protein serum levels showed a borderline statistical significance (odds ratio =0.904, 95% confidence interval 0.806-1.014, P=0.085).
Conclusions:
These findings are the first demonstration of in vivo eosinophil degranulation and basophil activation during ACS and of the prognostic role of eosinophil cationic protein in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction.
More Related Videos
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
10:03Coronary Progenitor Cells and Soluble Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Prognosis after Coronary Angioplasty
Published on: January 28, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Myocarditis I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests