Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Author Spotlight: Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Gastric Content Assessment and Risk Stratification in Perioperative Care
Published on: September 22, 2023
Computer versus physician identification of gastrointestinal alarm features
Christopher V Almario1, William D Chey2, Sentia Iriana3
1Division of Gastroenterology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Division of Gastroenterology, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Division of Digestive Diseases, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Cedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education (CS-CORE), Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Physicians documented fewer gastrointestinal (GI) alarm features than a computer algorithm. The Automated Evaluation of Gastrointestinal Symptoms (AEGIS) system identified more patients with positive alarm features, suggesting it can improve clinical care.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Clinical Informatics
- Health Informatics
Background:
- Inquiring about "alarm features" is crucial for identifying patients at risk for organic gastrointestinal (GI) disease.
- Systematic collection of patient-reported symptoms and alarm features can aid in diagnostic workup.
- The Automated Evaluation of Gastrointestinal Symptoms (AEGIS) is a computer algorithm designed to collect GI symptoms and alarm features, translating them into a history of present illness (HPI).
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the number of alarm features documented by physicians during usual care versus those collected by the AEGIS computer algorithm.
- To assess the efficacy of a computerized system in capturing critical patient-reported GI symptoms.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study with a paired sample design was conducted in adult GI clinics.
- Participants underwent usual physician care followed by completion of the AEGIS system.
- Blinded physician reviewers enumerated positive alarm features from both physician-documented and AEGIS-generated HPIs.
Main Results:
- AEGIS identified significantly more patients with positive alarm features (53%) compared to physicians (27%) (p<.001).
- AEGIS documented a higher median number of positive alarms (1) than physicians (0) (p<.001).
- Physicians documented only 30% of the positive alarm features self-reported by patients via AEGIS.
Conclusions:
- Physicians under-report significant gastrointestinal alarm features compared to patient self-reporting via a computer algorithm.
- Computerized systems like AEGIS can serve as a valuable complement to standard HPIs, potentially enhancing clinical care and diagnostic accuracy.
- Utilizing technology to systematically collect alarm features may improve the identification of patients requiring further investigation for organic GI disease.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems...
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Irritable Bowel Syndrome II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Evaluation
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is classified into subtypes based on the predominant bowel habits as determined by the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS). The subtypes are:
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:

