Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 5, 2026
Author Spotlight: Advancing Therapeutic Strategies for Improving Pregnancy Rates by Analyzing Embryo-Endometrium Interactions
Published on: June 21, 2024
Randomized, controlled pilot trial of natural versus hormone replacement therapy cycles in frozen embryo replacement
Ginny Mounce1, Enda McVeigh2, Karen Turner2
1Nuffield Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Reproductive Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Objective:
To determine whether there is any difference between the outcomes of two standard treatment protocols for frozen embryo replacement (FER): natural and down-regulated hormone replacement treatment (HRT).
Design:
Open, single-center, randomized, controlled pilot trial.
Setting:
Private fertility clinic.
Patient(S):
Women (n = 159) planning an FER cycle at the Oxford Fertility Unit, aged <40 years at the time their embryos were frozen; with at least one blastocyst or two cleavage-stage embryos in storage; regular ovulatory cycles; and at most two previous FER cycles.
Intervention(S):
Eligible participants were recruited and randomized between March 2010 and July 2012 into one of two standard FER treatment groups: natural (n = 80) menstrual (Natural) or GnRH agonist/HRT (n = 79) cycles.
Main Outcome Measure(S):
Live birth rate after replacement of frozen-thawed embryos, clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, and cycle cancellations.
Result(S):
A total of 159 women were randomized (80 Natural; 79 HRT), and 145 had ET and completed the study (72 Natural; 73 HRT). Pregnancy outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups. The live birth rates were 26.3% (Natural) and 31.7% (HRT) per randomized patient. Per ET/protocol the live birth rates were 29.2% and 34.2%. The implantation rates were 24.3% and 26.0%, and there were three twin births in the Natural and five in the HRT arms.
Conclusion(S):
The findings of this pilot study support the suggestion that for women with ovulatory cycles undergoing FER, the outcomes are similar between natural and HRT protocols.
Clinical Trial Registration Number:
NCT00843570. Registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov.
More Related Videos
05:32Author Spotlight: Investigating the Relationship Between FSH and Pathophysiological Changes in Perimenopausal Women - Insights from a Mouse Model
Published on: August 11, 2023
08:46Fertility Preservation Through Oocyte Vitrification: Clinical and Laboratory Perspectives
Published on: September 16, 2021
Related Concept Videos
01:24In Vitro Fertilization
The IVF process begins with ovarian stimulation, during which reproductive endocrinologists prescribe hormonal medications to stimulate the ovaries to produce multiple eggs instead of the single...
01:30Hormonal Control of the Ovarian Cycle
Before puberty, the hypothalamus releases GnRH in a low frequency, low amplitude pulsatile manner. This along with the immature hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis activity, results in low estrogen levels and the absence of a fully functional ovarian cycle. At puberty, GnRH secretion increases in both frequency and...