Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Transcription01:17

Transcription

3.5K
3.5K
Transcription01:10

Transcription

47.9K
47.9K
Types of Reports III: Telephone and Verbal Reports01:26

Types of Reports III: Telephone and Verbal Reports

1.1K
Telephone and Verbal Reports in healthcare settings are two communication methods for conveying therapeutic instructions from healthcare providers to nurses or other healthcare staff.
Here's an overview of each type:
Telephone Orders
1.1K
Errors in Taping01:18

Errors in Taping

460
Errors in taping arise from multiple factors that can significantly impact measurement accuracy in surveying. Misalignment of the tape, often due to human error, is one primary source. A skilled rear tapeman, using a telescope, can help correct alignment by guiding the head tapeman; however, human limitations still lead to small inaccuracies. These errors may include misplacement of pins or inaccurate tape readings due to common visual confusions, such as mistaking a six for a nine. Such...
460
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

12.1K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
12.1K
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying01:19

Errors and Mistakes in Surveying

957
Errors and mistakes in surveying refer to inaccuracies in measurements and data recording. The errors are deviations from the actual value caused by human sensory limitations, equipment flaws, or environmental effects. These errors are typically unintentional and can result from the inherent imperfections in the instruments used, atmospheric conditions, or the observer’s inability to perceive exact measurements. On the other hand, mistakes are caused by the surveyor's lack of...
957

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction: model for assisted target lobe selection.

BMJ open respiratory research·2025
Same author

Diagnostic Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Plantar Vein Thrombosis.

Foot & ankle international·2025
Same author

Long-Term Survival and CANARY-Based Artificial Intelligence for Multifocal Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health·2025
Same author

Radiomics-based Prediction of Local Recurrence after Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Annals of the American Thoracic Society·2025
Same author

Expanded AI learning: AI as a Tool for Human Learning.

Academic radiology·2025
Same author

Quantitative Chest CT Analysis: Three Different Approaches to Quantify the Burden of Viral Interstitial Pneumonia Using COVID-19 as a Paradigm.

Journal of clinical medicine·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors
08:32

Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors

Published on: January 3, 2017

23.6K

Syntactic and Semantic Errors in Radiology Reports Associated With Speech Recognition Software.

Michael D Ringler1, Brian C Goss1, Brian J Bartholmai1

  • 1Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
|August 12, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Speech recognition software (SRS) in radiology leads to errors impacting patient care. Quality control showed 9.7% of reports had errors, with material errors affecting interpretation in 1.9%.

More Related Videos

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

16.6K
A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ALS
12:43

A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ALS

Published on: February 21, 2011

36.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors
08:32

Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors

Published on: January 3, 2017

23.6K
A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

16.6K
A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ALS
12:43

A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ALS

Published on: February 21, 2011

36.2K

Area of Science:

  • Radiology and Medical Informatics

Background:

  • Speech recognition software (SRS) offers benefits in radiology but introduces errors.
  • These errors can potentially compromise patient care and diagnostic accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the frequency and types of errors in SRS-generated radiology reports.
  • To identify factors influencing error rates, including radiologist, subspecialty, and report type.

Main Methods:

  • A quality control project involving 13 medical transcriptionists proofreading 213,977 SRS-generated reports over 40 months.
  • Errors were classified as material (altering interpretation) or immaterial (spelling, intrusion/omission).
  • Statistical analyses including chi-squared and logistic regression were used to compare error proportions.

Main Results:

  • 9.7% of reports contained errors, with 1.9% classified as material.
  • Spelling errors were more frequent than intrusion/omission errors.
  • Error rates varied significantly by radiologist and imaging subspecialty, with higher rates in cross-sectional, outside reinterpretation, and procedural reports.

Conclusions:

  • SRS use in radiology is associated with a significant error rate, necessitating robust quality control.
  • Error patterns are influenced by radiologist, subspecialty, and report characteristics.
  • While error rates decreased over time, ongoing vigilance is crucial for patient safety.