The Role of Burden and Deviation in Ostracizing Others
Eric D Wesselmann1, James H Wirth, John B Pryor
1a Illinois State University.
The Journal of Social Psychology
|August 13, 2015
Summary
Individuals ostracize burdensome deviants but not non-burdensome deviants. This study differentiates between types of deviation to explain ostracism, finding that perceived burden predicts exclusion.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Behavioral Science
- Group Dynamics
Background:
- Ostracism, the experience of being excluded, is psychologically painful.
- Previous research indicates deviation often leads to ostracism, but this is not always consistent.
- The reasons behind selective ostracism remain incompletely understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether the type of deviation (burdensome vs. non-burdensome) influences ostracism.
- To test the hypothesis that burdensome deviation is a key predictor of social exclusion.
- To differentiate the social perception and behavioral responses to different forms of deviation.
Main Methods:
- Study 1: Manipulated burdensome deviation by varying player speed in a virtual ball-toss game.
- Study 2: Compared responses to burdensome deviation (slow players) and non-burdensome deviation (goth appearance).
- Measured participants' perceptions of deviation burden and their subsequent ostracism behaviors.
Main Results:
- Participants perceived slower players as more burdensome and deviant than normal-speed players.
- Slower, burdensome deviants were ostracized (received fewer ball tosses).
- Deviants perceived as non-burdensome (goth appearance) were not ostracized.
Conclusions:
- The perceived burden of a deviation, not just its deviance, significantly predicts ostracism.
- Burdensome deviations are actively excluded from social groups.
- Understanding the nature of deviation is crucial for explaining the dynamics of social exclusion.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Bullying
9.0K
A modern form of aggression is bullying. As you learn in your study of child development, socializing and playing with other children is beneficial for children’s psychological development. However, as you may have experienced as a child, not all play behavior has positive outcomes. Some children are aggressive and want to play roughly. Other children are selfish and do not want to share toys. One form of negative social interactions among children that has become a national concern is...
9.0K
In- and Out-Groups
44.1K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
44.1K
Stereotype Content Model
15.7K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
15.7K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
96.0K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
96.0K
Deindividuation
31.2K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
31.2K
The Stanford Prison Experiment
25.1K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
25.1K


