Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

1.2K
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
1.2K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.8K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.7K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.7K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

7.3K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.3K
Critical Thinking II01:25

Critical Thinking II

5.3K
Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
5.3K
First Impression01:09

First Impression

363
First impressions play a crucial role in social perception, shaping how individuals assess others in professional, academic, and interpersonal contexts. Psychological research highlights the significance of cognitive biases, such as the primacy and recency effects, which influence how people interpret and recall information.The Primacy Effect and Cognitive AnchoringThe primacy effect describes the tendency for initial information to impact judgment disproportionately. When individuals encounter...
363

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Using Serious Games to Increase the Implementation of Trauma Triage Guidelines: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA·2026
Same author

Clinicians' Approaches to Prognostication After Traumatic Brain Injury and Cardiac Arrest: A Multi-Hospital, Qualitative Study.

Neurocritical care·2026
Same author

Correction: Cross-sectional validation of the PROMIS-Preference scoring system.

PloS one·2025
Same author

An Educational Video Game in Trauma Triage at Nontrauma Centers: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA network open·2025
Same author

Recovery Potential in Patients After Cardiac Arrest Who Die After Limitations or Withdrawal of Life Support.

JAMA network open·2025
Same author

Public Understanding of Risk and Benefit of Mifepristone: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA network open·2025
Same journal

Functional Neural Architecture of Working Memory in Musicians: An ALE Meta-Analysis and Review.

Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Collective Memory in Animals.

Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

What Counts as an Environment in Memory Research? Conceptualizing Environment Across Memory Traditions.

Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Origins and Evolution of Imagination, From Australopithecus to Modern-Day Deep Learning.

Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Multilevel Perceptual-Motor Coupling: From Action Understanding to Execution.

Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Hope in Early Childhood: Novel Methodology for Measuring Hope in 5- and 6-Year-Olds.

Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 5, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.6K

Judgment and decision making.

Baruch Fischhoff1

  • 1Department of Social and Decision Sciences, and Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213-3890, USA.

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science
|August 15, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study explores judgment and decision making through normative, descriptive, and prescriptive research. Understanding cognitive and affective processes, including biases, is key to improving decision-making competence.

More Related Videos

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.6K
Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

3.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 5, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.6K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.6K
Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

3.2K

Area of Science:

  • Decision Sciences
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Judgment and decision making research integrates normative, descriptive, and prescriptive approaches.
  • Foundations lie in economics, psychology, philosophy, and management science, incorporating affective and social factors.
  • The field has evolved from predicting choices to understanding the underlying decision-making processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the three core research forms in decision science: normative, descriptive, and prescriptive.
  • To explore the integration of cognitive, affective, and social factors in decision-making processes.
  • To examine the role of biases in revealing non-normative decision-making and their practical implications.

Main Methods:

  • Review of analytical foundations from economics, psychology, philosophy, and management science.
  • Analysis of research methodologies focusing on normative ideals, descriptive behaviors, and prescriptive interventions.
  • Examination of how biases inform the understanding of decision-making processes.

Main Results:

  • Decision sciences utilize a multidisciplinary framework to study choice behavior.
  • Understanding decision-making requires analyzing cognitive, affective, and social influences.
  • Biases are critical indicators of non-normative processes, with practical relevance dependent on decision context.

Conclusions:

  • The field emphasizes understanding decision-making processes over mere prediction.
  • Decision competence is nuanced, influenced by specific choices and available support.
  • A suite of theories and methods captures the complexities of human judgment and decision making.