Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
Published on: February 8, 2019
Infant categorization
David H Rakison1, Yevdokiya Yermolayeva1
1Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Insights
Infant categorization research has advanced our understanding of
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Science
- Developmental Psychology
- Infant Cognition
Background:
- Decades of research have explored infant categorization using behavioral methods.
- Key findings illuminate the 'what' and 'when' of infant categorization abilities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review principal findings in infant categorization over the past 30 years.
- To identify limitations in understanding the mechanisms and conceptual development of infant categorization.
- To propose future research directions for the field.
Main Methods:
- Review of behaviorally based experiments.
- Analysis of visual preference, habituation, object examining, sequential touching, and inductive generalization procedures.
- Critique of existing methodologies and interpretation of data.
Main Results:
- Significant progress in describing infant categorization behaviors.
- Persistent challenges in elucidating underlying mechanisms and concept development.
- Context-specific nature of infant categorization and lack of interpretive ground rules identified as key limitations.
Conclusions:
- Current research has not fully clarified the mechanisms of infant categorization or concept development.
- Interdisciplinary approaches integrating imaging and computational methods are recommended.
- Adopting new methodologies can enhance understanding of infant cognitive processes.
Abstract:
In this article, we review the principal findings on infant categorization from the last 30 years. The review focuses on behaviorally based experiments with visual preference, habituation, object examining, sequential touching, and inductive generalization procedures. We propose that although this research has helped to elucidate the 'what' and 'when' of infant categorization, it has failed to clarify the mechanisms that underpin this behavior and the development of concepts. We outline a number of reasons for why the field has failed in this regard, most notably because of the context-specific nature of infant categorization and a lack of ground rules in interpreting data. We conclude by suggesting that one remedy for this issue is for infant categorization researchers to adopt more of an interdisciplinary approach by incorporating imaging and computational methods into their current methodological arsenal. WIREs Cogn Sci 2010 1 894-905 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.
More Related Videos
05:35Experience is Instrumental in Tuning a Link Between Language and Cognition: Evidence from 6- to 7- Month-Old Infants' Object Categorization
Published on: April 19, 2017
14:38Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
Published on: November 2, 2012
Related Concept Videos
The Nativist Approach
Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development
Exploration...
How Data are Classified: Categorical Data
Data are classified based on whether they are measurable or not. Categorical data cannot be measured; instead, it can be divided into categories. For example, if Y denotes a person's party affiliation, some examples of Y include...
Attachment
Socioemotional Development during Infancy
Primary Temperament Types
Self-Concept
Infancy and Emerging Recognition
During infancy, self-concept is virtually nonexistent. Babies do not distinguish themselves as separate entities and often mistake their...