Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.3K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.3K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

391
Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
391
Group Design02:01

Group Design

11.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
11.0K
Methods of Medium Optimization01:28

Methods of Medium Optimization

53
Optimizing growth media enhances microbial proliferation and maximizes product yield. Statistical experimental design methodologies provide structured and reproducible approaches, offering progressively higher levels of robustness and efficiency.The One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) MethodThe One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) method involves adjusting a single variable while keeping all others constant. However, it cannot detect interactions between variables, often leading to suboptimal outcomes when...
53
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

13.9K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
13.9K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

711
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
711

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Towards an ecosystem of clinical decision support tools for precision cancer medicine.

NPJ precision oncology·2026
Same author

European cancer data sharing: Analyses of an international survey.

International journal of medical informatics·2026
Same author

Proteomic Profiling Using a Proximity Extension Assay Panel on Serum Samples Stored at -25°C Over Several Decades.

Proteomics·2026
Same author

Systematic interrogation of drug sensitivities in melanoma reveals potent synergistic and antagonistic drug combinations with translational potential.

Communications medicine·2026
Same author

Exploring Taq polymerase induced mutations in part of BRAF exon 15 by sequencing and mutation enrichment.

Mutation research·2026
Same author

TrialMatchAI: an end-to-end AI-powered clinical trial recommendation system to streamline patient-to-trial matching.

Nature communications·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K

Methods that remove batch effects while retaining group differences may lead to exaggerated confidence in downstream

Vegard Nygaard1, Einar Andreas Rødland1, Eivind Hovig2

  • 1Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital HF - Radiumhospitalet, Montebello, 0310 Oslo, Norway.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)
|August 15, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Batch effect adjustment in gene expression data is crucial. Unbalanced group distribution across batches can lead to false discoveries when preserving group differences during adjustment.

Keywords:
Batch effectsData normalizationMicroarraysReproducible research

More Related Videos

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.5K
Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
07:40

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design

Published on: May 31, 2021

4.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.5K
Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
07:40

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design

Published on: May 31, 2021

4.3K

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Genomics
  • Statistical analysis

Background:

  • Batch effects in gene expression data can confound analyses, especially from multiple sources.
  • Existing methods for batch effect removal may introduce bias when study groups are unevenly distributed across batches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the potential for false discoveries when using methods that preserve group differences in unbalanced batch designs.
  • To raise awareness within the scientific community about this analytical pitfall.

Main Methods:

  • Review of common batch effect adjustment strategies.
  • Analysis of scenarios involving unbalanced group distribution across batches.
  • Examination of two-way ANOVA models for simultaneous group and batch effect estimation.

Main Results:

  • Preserving group differences in unbalanced batch designs can systematically distort true group effects.
  • This distortion can lead to incorrect conclusions and false discoveries in downstream analyses.
  • The scientific community may be unaware of this specific limitation.

Conclusions:

  • Careful consideration of batch and group distribution is essential for accurate gene expression data analysis.
  • Standard batch adjustment methods may require modification or alternative approaches for unbalanced datasets.
  • Further research into robust methods for handling batch effects in complex study designs is warranted.