Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
Methods that remove batch effects while retaining group differences may lead to exaggerated confidence in downstream
Vegard Nygaard1, Einar Andreas Rødland1, Eivind Hovig2
1Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital HF - Radiumhospitalet, Montebello, 0310 Oslo, Norway.
Abstract:
Removal of, or adjustment for, batch effects or center differences is generally required when such effects are present in data. In particular, when preparing microarray gene expression data from multiple cohorts, array platforms, or batches for later analyses, batch effects can have confounding effects, inducing spurious differences between study groups. Many methods and tools exist for removing batch effects from data. However, when study groups are not evenly distributed across batches, actual group differences may induce apparent batch differences, in which case batch adjustments may bias, usually deflate, group differences. Some tools therefore have the option of preserving the difference between study groups, e.g. using a two-way ANOVA model to simultaneously estimate both group and batch effects. Unfortunately, this approach may systematically induce incorrect group differences in downstream analyses when groups are distributed between the batches in an unbalanced manner. The scientific community seems to be largely unaware of how this approach may lead to false discoveries.
Related Concept Videos
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Group Design
Methods of Medium Optimization
Blind Procedures
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

